Talk:Imperial Court in Kyoto

Law Low‑importance

	Law portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Law, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the legal field and the subjects encompassed by it.LawWikipedia:WikiProject LawTemplate:WikiProject Lawlaw articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Japan: History / Royalty & nobility High‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Japan, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Japan-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project, participate in relevant discussions, and see lists of open tasks. Current time in Japan: 08:08, May 8, 2024 (JST, Reiwa 6) (Refresh)JapanWikipedia:WikiProject JapanTemplate:WikiProject JapanJapan-related articles

High

This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

This article is supported by the History task force.

This article is supported by the Royalty and nobility task force.

WikiProject Japan to do list:

Peer review: Kako River (Japan)
A-class review: None

Featured content candidates –

Articles: None
Pictures: None
Lists: None

Good article nominations: Pure Japanese, Vinland Saga (TV series), Japanese destroyer Ume (1944), Mai Fujisawa, Godzilla Minus One
Add requested images to articles that need them.
Pages for Deletion: Participate in Japan-related deletion discussions.
Improve and expand Japan-related stubs.
Create some requested articles.
Help translate an article from the Japanese Wikipedia into English.
Assess unassessed articles

Untitled[edit]

Doesn't the article Kyoto Gosho basically mention what is already written in this article? All the information that is here could be added/merged with there I think... anyone who disagrees please by all means say so. Gryffindor 22:43, 22 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

The difference is this article is about the political entity while the article you mentioned is about a building. Or this is how the two articles should develop. -- Taku 22:57, 22 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

I agree with Taku that the articles should remain separate. Kyoto Gosho should give the history of the palace (when & where established, burned, moved, war, architecture, landscape). Imperial Court in Kyoto should discuss the people, ranks, titles, ceremonies, intrigues etc. Fg2 10:14, 23 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

I also agree with Taku. In my opinion it is rather a case of expanding the article on the Imperial Court (People, organisation, history). Chingon86 02:50, 15 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

I also agree with Taku. There is a difference between a court and a palace: The Kyoto Gosho still stands, as of today, and the court is gone. How comes? Well, looks like the people are missing. -- Mkill 18:42, 20 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, since it's now 4:1 against merge after 2 month I removed the tag. -- Mkill 19:05, 20 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]