Talk:Hustler's Ambition

Hustler's Ambition has been listed as one of the Music good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.

Article milestones
Date	Process	Result
February 3, 2013	Good article nominee	Listed

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Hustler's Ambition article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Hip hop Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Hip hop, a collaborative effort to build a useful resource for and improve the coverage of hip hop on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.Hip hopWikipedia:WikiProject Hip hopTemplate:WikiProject Hip hopHip hop articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Songs

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Songs, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of songs on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SongsWikipedia:WikiProject SongsTemplate:WikiProject Songssong articles

Piggy Bank[edit]

Should this be shown in the chronology section? When I was skimming through the chronology of 50 Cent's singles, I noticed that the Piggy Bank page itself has no connection to the chronological order of the rest of the singles. In this way, it messes up the run of singles between Outta Control and Hustler's Ambition. Also, just noticed it's not even shown as a single in the 50 Cent template. => Harish - 14:01, 15 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not sure if it is because it was form the GRODT soundtrack, Feel free to add it if you tink that it should be there. --¤ The-G-Unit-฿oss ¤ 19:04, 17 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

File:En-hustlersambition.ogg Nominated for speedy Deletion[edit]

An image used in this article, File:En-hustlersambition.ogg, has been nominated for speedy deletion for the following reason: All Wikipedia files with unknown copyright status

What should I do?

Don't panic; you should have time to contest the deletion (although please review deletion guidelines before doing so). The best way to contest this form of deletion is by posting on the image talk page.

If the image is non-free then you may need to provide a fair use rationale
If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale, then it cannot be uploaded or used.
If the image has already been deleted you may want to try Deletion Review

To take part in any discussion, or to review a more detailed deletion rationale please visit the relevant image page (File:En-hustlersambition.ogg)

This is Bot placed notification, another user has nominated/tagged the image --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 05:36, 20 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

GA Review[edit]

This review is transcluded from Talk:Hustler's Ambition/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: JayJay (talk · contribs) 23:37, 2 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Rate	Attribute	Review Comment
1. Well-written:
	1a. the prose is clear, concise, and understandable to an appropriately broad audience; spelling and grammar are correct.	No grammatical errors
	1b. it complies with the Manual of Style guidelines for lead sections, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation.	Complies with MoS
2. Verifiable with no original research:
	2a. it contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline.	Has appropriate section for references.
	2b. reliable sources are cited inline. All content that could reasonably be challenged, except for plot summaries and that which summarizes cited content elsewhere in the article, must be cited no later than the end of the paragraph (or line if the content is not in prose).	~~References 10,11,12 give me an error. Please fix them.~~ Done
	2c. it contains no original research.	No original research
3. Broad in its coverage:
	3a. it addresses the main aspects of the topic.	Addresses main aspects
	3b. it stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see summary style).	Stays on topic
	4. Neutral: it represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each.	Stays neutral
	5. Stable: it does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute.	No Edit wars
6. Illustrated, if possible, by media such as images, video, or audio:
	6a. media are tagged with their copyright statuses, and valid non-free use rationales are provided for non-free content.	Good
	6b. media are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions.	Good
	7. Overall assessment.	~~I will put this on hold until the three sources are fixed. Cheers!~~ All issues have been fixed.

The references have now been fixed. I Am Rufus • Conversation is a beautiful thing. 13:47, 3 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Pass JayJay^{What did I do?} 17:38, 3 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]