Talk:Howard Beale (Network)

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

My only reaction[edit]

My only reaction is that I don't feel this is a stub at all. I think it, rather succinctly, shows Howard's character vis a vis the film as a whole. I could see where many would think it to not voice the entire point of the film, but I say that is because Howard Beale is not the only significant character in the film. The relationship between Schumacher and Christensen is another main talking point that should either be in the main article or fully expressed in two separate articles concerning the two. 71.60.175.57 06:49, 22 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

My substitute teacher[edit]

Off topic. WikiWisePowder (talk) 14:46, 4 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

i have a substitute teacher named Howard Beele and im not even yanking your chain. I call him Uncle Howie, but he just calls me a hooligan and tells me to go away. But i dont and i say it again. He then calls me a hooligan again and i call him a backyardigan. Again, he is very interested in Shakespeare and likes the play the Jabawokie. He is very good at English and social studies. He is my favorite substitute teacher. He knows many songs and his dad published a book. He has ten degrees to Harvard. Earlier in his life, he won a drinking contest and then he was approached by a large man named Gerrard Pagano. He took him with his Shakespeare knowledge and hit him with his Shakespeare autobiography. Gerrard Pagano did get a stab in his shoulder and he became a hunchback. He talks like a very edjucated man and is very attractive.


He has an outstanding physical appearence. He dresses in a suit with a tie and a sweatervest. His hair is back slick and has a beard. Both his hair and his beard are gray. He is 72 years old. I like Howard Beele —Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.229.96.229 (talk) 23:50, 16 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]


the new anchor:[edit]

i can't believe how corrupt this institute is. he plays a character of a man who's been exposed to how things really work, and don't afraid to say them. in the scene at mr. jensen's office he can clearly be seen smiling at what he's hearing and understanding he has support.

he was not insane the whole movie.

he was the most sane man out of them all.

of course wikipedia represents the eyesight of the majority of the population, which are ignorant delusional cattle, and therefore my point of view will never be shown to the public. the power to an opinion is the power of ignorance.

what you call freedom is actually slavery.

finally, after you've read (or more precisely haven't read) what i wrote, you would erase everything thinking something like "this ain't appropriate".

Wiki encyclopedia: free of thinking —Preceding unsigned comment added by 84.229.178.101 (talk) 08:15, 6 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

No sources, No article[edit]

This article bears no sources whatsoever to retain an article on it's own. But User:HarringtonSmith insists "the film is the source". Since no information on the article can be found on the Internet, Howard Beale is not intitled to an article. Rusted AutoParts (talk) 14:16 2 June 2011 (UTC)