Talk:Hooters/Archives/2018
 | This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Article seems to have been written by company staff
I find it hard to believe that an impartial article would not contain the word "objectification" even once. Also going into detail about what kind of food is on offer is very transparently something who works there would do. Honestly big enough articles about companies ought to be locked from the general public and only known wikipedians allowed to contribute, this conflict of interest issue is embarrasing (so says me, a non-contributor) 2A02:2F0A:C070:979:51E6:7F16:5992:C6AF (talk) 09:46, 21 August 2018 (UTC)
- Hm, it seems to me that using the term "objectification" is not very impartial now is it? And I'm not sure why you consider an article about a restaurant should not include a description of the food it serves.
- There is also something rather unsettling about your statement "articles about companies ought to be locked from the general public and only known wikipedians allowed to contribute" - this is Wikipedia "The encyclopedia anyone can edit".
- Can you be more specific in your perceived issues, and where exactly you see a conflict of interest? Chaheel Riens (talk) 11:03, 21 August 2018 (UTC)