Talk:Holmwood railway station

Trains Portal

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Trains, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to rail transport on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. See also: WikiProject Trains to do list and the Trains Portal.TrainsWikipedia:WikiProject TrainsTemplate:WikiProject Trainsrail transport articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Associated projects or task forces:
/
	This article is supported by WikiProject Stations.
	This article is supported by WikiProject UK Railways (assessed as Low-importance).

Surrey Low‑importance

	Surrey portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Surrey, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Surrey on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SurreyWikipedia:WikiProject SurreyTemplate:WikiProject SurreySurrey-related articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Interesting but[edit]

The historical perspective section may be interesting but does it really belong here? Very railway geek talk about stock and other geek stuff. This page should be about the station (and its history) not so much detail is required here. This information may belong with the history of the line rather than the station with just a brief note regarding its "glory days." — Preceding unsigned comment added by 92.29.112.198 (talk) 12:44, 1 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

And for another perspective:

Yes no doubt very geeky but thanks for destroying factual information and turning this article back into a pretty much useless stub of absolutely no value to anyone. This is the problem with Wikipedia - people like you destroy well researched if rather geeky input rather than improving it. If you feel it belongs somewhere else then please have the courtesy to put it somewhere else, and at the same time improve the style which I assume your apparently classy classical education makes you well able to do. And by the way if there had never been geeks there never would have been a railway to serve Holmwood. We can't all be bankers etc who bring nothing to the real economy. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.20.135.77 (talk) 03:59, 18 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Brevity and/or Stub OnlyNess Is Not Better — Preceding unsigned comment added by Capvermell (talk • contribs) 12:56, 5 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Please put back the geeky stuff if it is about the railway history of Holmwood station and not just about the Mid Sussex line or Southern Railway or LBSCR in general. Regarding the actions of the brevity zealot you do of course have the ability to keep rolling back his changes until he gets bored. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Capvermell (talk • contribs) 12:53, 5 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

If the anti history and pro stub only entry zealot removes the useful history of this station again I give notice that I intend to restore it and put the matter in dispute for resolution with Wikipedia. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Capvermell (talk • contribs) 13:51, 5 February 2012‎

Please sign your posts, see WP:SIGN.

Who are you in dispute with? Nobody, apart from myself, has edited this article since your first edit to it.

Please note what it says in the text below the "Save page" button.

We have certain core policies on verifiability, original research, neutral point-of-view which you should follow at all times. --Redrose64 (talk) 18:43, 5 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]