Talk:Hogarth Roundabout

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Creation of the roundabout[edit]

It would be nice to add a summary of the relatively recent creation of this roundabout and the new road system, which has so devastated Old Chiswick and Hammersmith. The article on the A4 also omits this topic. I fear that if I wrote it it would violate the POV rules. I will try to find a factual reference though. Davidnugget (talk) 23:02, 23 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, there's certainly no place for editorial opinions here, nor for selective use of opposition statements. But a cited description of the changes would be of value. Chiswick Chap (talk) 10:02, 24 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Hogarth Roundabout. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 16:37, 4 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]