Talk:History of wikis

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Suggested Improvements[edit]

Good article. Some of it borders on original research, and using pages from WikiWikiWeb as a reference is a bit questionable, as a) wikis are often not considered reliable sources, and c2.com in particular lacks adequate version control. Also, the article as it stands is a bit long... an article on History of WikiWikiWeb is screaming to get out. Finally, some mention ought to be made of wiki farms such as Wikia and WikiSpaces, among others. --EngineerScotty 21:43, 15 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for the appreciation. I worried a bit about the original research aspect, but since there seems to be little out there on the history of wikis, I went ahead and used what I could find, leaning heavily on wiki sources. And I'm afraid that if I create a separate article on History of WikiWikiWeb some administrator will find it unjustified or suggest that it be merged back into the WikiWikiWeb article. I agree about adding wiki farms, but at the moment I'm a bit exhausted from my labours. I also thought of adding something about Wikimania, Wiki Symposium and RecentChangesCamp, but as you note the article is already rather long. - Redeyed Treefrog 22:25, 16 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Another possibility would be to create a separate article on History of wiki engines, or even a separate one on History of wiki websites. - Redeyed Treefrog 08:23, 17 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Peter Merel or Peter Merrel?[edit]

An unsigned IP edit changed the spelling from "Peter Merel" to "Peter Merrel." I believe this is incorrect: a Google search for "Merel + CvWiki" returns a great many entries, but a search for "Merrel + CvWiki" returns nothing. Moreover, why was the spelling only changed in one spot, when Merel is mentioned three times in the article? I have used an "undo" to put the spelling back to "Peter Merel." - Redeyed Treefrog 22:37, 15 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

redrects[edit]

Is Metawiki supposed to redirect here? 75.66.180.12 (talk) 19:03, 9 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Everything2[edit]

The jump from Cunningham's WikiWiki to post-Wikipedia is a bit sudden. At least Everything2 should be mentioned here, I believe. It originated at Slashdot but attracted a wide non-geek audience right from the start, although it didn't quite break through to the general public. Here is a usage report I saved: 

Everything2 Statistics as of 2001-11-04 04:00:03
*---------------------------------------------------------------*        
E2Nodes total: 392,294 (163 since Yesterday)
Writeups total: 496,743 (-32 since Yesterday)
Users total: 40,686 (20 since Yesterday)
Links total: 4,796,371 (6,354 since Yesterday)
Votes cast total: 3,701,821 (4,052 since Yesterday)
Experience total: 3,838,798 (5,715 since Yesterday)
Nodeviews total: 71,770,232 (139,636 since Yesterday)

Rp (talk) 17:04, 22 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Trim WikiWikiWeb discussion?[edit]

WikiWikiWeb having its own page, I feel the detailed discussion of its history I'm seeing here should be moved over. It makes the present article unbalanced (and it is already unbalanced enough in other ways). Rp (talk) 16:11, 24 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Yaron K has just improved this, great! Still I think the discussion of the internal WikiWikiWeb politics is out of place here. Not having used it I don't want to do it myself. 08:01, 14 January 2010 (UTC)

Post-WikiWikiWeb[edit]

I feel like the heading title "Post-WikiWikiWeb" isn't approperiate because there is no discussion of WikiWikiWeb before the section begins. I think a more appropriate title would be something like "1994-2001: The First Wikis" (especially because the years in the Post-WikiWikiWeb header are in a different format to those in the other section headers). I might be missing something though, so I decided to not make the change myself and instead post here Allanlw 17:37, 25 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Pre-1994[edit]

Isn't it better to limit this article to Wikis? People can look up the history of hypertext or the World Wide Web in those articles, can't they? Rp (talk) 18:39, 23 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on History of wikis. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 18:12, 3 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on History of wikis. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 12:51, 5 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified (January 2018)[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 4 external links on History of wikis. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 22:25, 25 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Wiki numbers[edit]

It would be useful to include the number of wikis in different periods or at least the current number if there's a source for that. Mcljlm (talk) 02:12, 27 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Section for 2013-Present[edit]

Can somebody please help and update this article to 2013-present? I hae very limited knowledge of the subject and don't even know really to get started. Imurmate (talk) 00:09, 5 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

FedWiki[edit]

For the last 10 years, Cunningham and a team of developers has been focused on a reimagined wiki, known as the Federated Wiki, to address fundamental concerns of the original wiki architecture and experience. Curious why there is no mention of that work in this article. — Preceding unsigned comment added by IslandWay (talk • contribs) 18:54, 11 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:History_of_wikis&oldid=1207559818"