Talk:Highbridge and Burnham railway station

Trains Portal

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Trains, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to rail transport on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. See also: WikiProject Trains to do list and the Trains Portal.TrainsWikipedia:WikiProject TrainsTemplate:WikiProject Trainsrail transport articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Associated projects or task forces:
/
	This article is supported by WikiProject Stations.
	This article is supported by WikiProject UK Railways (assessed as Low-importance).

Somerset Low‑importance

	Somerset portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Somerset, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Somerset on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SomersetWikipedia:WikiProject SomersetTemplate:WikiProject SomersetSomerset articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

The route diagram template for this article can be found in Template:Highbridge and Burnham railway station.

It's Highbridge & Burnham, isn't it? (not "and").

If passengers need to get tickets on the train "at other times" what does this mean?

Afterbrunel 20:11, 13 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Tidied up the last line. Don't think the "and/&" thing matters: in that the "&" is a symbol that means "and", the title is probably correct fully spelled out. Johnlp 08:32, 14 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

While not an officiual Wiki convention, it is usual to use "and" rather than "&" as this is easier to read if English is not your first language. Geof Sheppard 07:22, 16 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

On 29 May 2023, it was proposed that this article be moved to Highbridge & Burnham railway station. The result of the discussion was not moved.

Requested move 29 May 2023[edit]

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: not moved. (closed by non-admin page mover) CLYDE ^{TALK TO ME}/_{STUFF DONE} (please mention me on reply) 02:06, 5 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Highbridge and Burnham railway station → Highbridge & Burnham railway station – Station is named with ampersand per Great Western Railway and National Rail thus article name should reflect per MOS:&. Madditron (talk) 01:48, 29 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Support. Common usage is mixed but with a slight preference towards the ampersand. I'm not finding a lot of images that show the station signage, but what there is all shows an ampersand. Thryduulf (talk) 09:24, 29 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Mild support because Wikipedia prefers 'and' unless there is a compelling reason to change. From previous discussions we know that GWR and Network rail are not consistent in applying signage. I just took a look at GWR's train planner and it syas "Highbridge" but their timetable says "Highbridge & Burnham"! Geof Sheppard (talk) 12:36, 30 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose. Ampersands are generally best expanded unless they are exclusively used. See WP:AMPERSAND. -- Necrothesp (talk) 12:19, 31 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose - Ampersands are so 2005. Irrespective of what the official name is I don't see the benefit or value having "&" over "and" - Means the same thing and does the same job. –Davey2010^Talk 23:30, 31 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.