Talk:Hepatitis D/Archive 1

STD?[edit]

I've removed the template. Arguably, D can be acquired sexually, but my understanding of the literature is that it's primarily blood borne, with highest rates in users of IV drugs and people who have had multiple blood transfusions (at least in North America). -- Samir धर्म 03:24, 8 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Popular culture[edit]

Is the section on popular culture really necessary? It seems totally irrelevant in an encyclopedic article. --CharlesC (talk) 13:58, 12 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

It could be necessary, I'm assuming that a high amount of the visits due to this article will be from popular culture, particularly the television series, True Blood. As a large number of people are visual learners, seeing references to other television shows that portray Hepatitis D could assist them in their search to learn about the illness. I understand CharlesC's reasoning, but I feel that this can be addressed by talking about how accurate the portrayal of the illness is in each show. As a patient of a chronic illness I fully understand how it can feel to have your illness portrayed incorrectly, but if it is able to spark a person's interest to learn about the condition it's certainly doing some good which should be encouraged. Naturally, this will require assistance from users who are well versed in the condition (for example, a doctor or patient of the condition), as well as users who are well versed in the television show that portray the condition. The section may be a little 'messy' at first, but I feel with the required effort, it could definitely be used to help educate others (please forgive me if I've used incorrect terminology or disobeyed any guidelines, I've only commented on and edited a few articles, so I'm still learning) Berrie (talk) 06:43, 25 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Hepatitis D. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080318200937/http://www.who.int/csr/disease/hepatitis/whocdscsrncs20011/en/index.html to http://www.who.int/csr/disease/hepatitis/whocdscsrncs20011/en/index.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 07:17, 1 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]