Talk:Henry Clay Fry

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Henry Clay Fry. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:16, 31 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

References[edit]

  • [1] Glass Towns: Industry, Labor and Political Economy in Appalachia, 1890-1930s Ken Fones-Wolf
  • [2] Fry Glass Company historical site
  • 40.70163878137926, -80.28577541731484 is the location of the parka and the old factory

--Stone (talk) 09:00, 19 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]


GA Review[edit]

This review is transcluded from Talk:Henry Clay Fry/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: David Eppstein (talk · contribs) 06:19, 10 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Another plagiarism quickfail.

I checked three sources, chosen among the 20 in the article as the ones recent enough to still be in copyright and, among those, the first three I was able to check. In all three I found plagiarism, wording so close to the source as to have been copied from it and lightly rephrased rather than freshly written.

Our article: "The glass was pressed into a mold where previously the technique of cut glass had only been blown by hand." Kane 1997: "The glass was pressed into a mold ... Previously, cut glass had been blown."

Our article: "at it [sic] peak could produce thirty-five thousand tumblers a day with one hundred workers" Hawkins 2009: "At their peak they could produce thirty-five thousand tumblers per day with one hundred workers". The material sourced to Hawkins in three other places is also closely paraphrased, but not as close as this one.

Our article (credited to source but not marked as a direct quote): "produced the finest cut glass made in an American glasshouse in the first years of the twentieth century". Pittsburgh Post-Gazette: "produced ... the finest cut glass made in an American glasshouse in the first years of this century".

As with Talk:Conrad Hubert/GA1, this needs a ground-up rewrite, with all material from modern sources freshly organized with fresh (not copied and rephrased) prose or (in unusual cases where keeping the same wording is necessary) marked and attributed as quotes, and with all wording that is copied from out-of-copyright sources clearly identified as coming from those sources.