Talk:Height of Buildings Act of 1910

A fact from Height of Buildings Act of 1910 appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 13 August 2008, and was viewed approximately 3,218 times (disclaimer) (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:

Did you know... that the Heights of Buildings Act of 1910 restricts the height of buildings in Washington D.C. to 20 ft (6 m) taller than the width of the street they face?

A record of the entry may be seen at Wikipedia:Recent additions/2008/August.

Wikipedia

United States: District of Columbia Low‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject District of Columbia (assessed as Low-importance).

Urban studies and planning Low‑importance

	Architecture portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Urban studies and planning, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Urban studies and planning on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Urban studies and planningWikipedia:WikiProject Urban studies and planningTemplate:WikiProject Urban studies and planningUrban studies and planning articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Law

	Law portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Law, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the legal field and the subjects encompassed by it.LawWikipedia:WikiProject LawTemplate:WikiProject Lawlaw articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Heights of Buildings Act of Height of Buildings Act?[edit]

I'm seeing federal government sources using both titles, and this page's primary-source link is broken. Is it the Heights of Building Act or Height of Buildings Act? IFCAR (talk) 05:03, 12 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Height of Buildings Act of 1910. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 02:36, 31 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

160 or 180?[edit]

The "Background" first paragraph seems to imply that the tallest a building can be anywhere in the city is 160 feet. Yet in the "Section 5" subsection, a particular area of the city reads:

"...height not to exceed 180 feet (55 m)..."

So which is it? --Criticalthinker (talk) 08:43, 1 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Article is a mess. The primary source seems not to have been in operation for years. I have found some additional sources and will be paring down and rearranging this article for the better, namely that the main article will feature the basics and not multi-paragraph excerpts, and that it will be made clear the handful or so times the act has been amended since 1910 to make exceptions for certain structures. --Criticalthinker (talk) 05:19, 10 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]