Talk:Great hammerhead

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Good articleGreat hammerhead has been listed as one of the Natural sciences good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
April 27, 2009Good article nomineeListed

Comments[edit]

On what sort of scale do conservation efforts need to be acted on in order to stop the decline of hammerhead sharks.--Jamccurdy17 (talk) 01:54, 24 January 2020 (UTC) Thats one cool shark —Preceding unsigned comment added by Spockinator2004 (talkcontribs) 21:31, 21 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

What's that gotta do with the article? Weirdy 09:30, 2 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

It says 'Asian market' and delicay of 'Asians', but it is generally a Chinese thing is it not?[[(talk) 10:27, 24 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

GA Review[edit]

This review is transcluded from Talk:Great hammerhead/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Hi, I am reviewing this article for GA. It is a generally good article. I have a few comments regarding the prose which I am sure you can easily address. —Mattisse (Talk) 22:33, 27 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Comments
  • "prey items" - prey is enough, "items" is unnecessary - so I have removed "items"
  • OK
  • the cephalofoil functions to pin down stingrays, - what does "pin down" mean? I interpreted it to mean that it kept the population of stingrays down, but then in the article I see you mean literally pin down. I don't think this wording is good for the lead.
  • Changed to "immobilize"; open to other suggestions
  • "The great hammerhead was first described as Zygaena mokarran in 1837 by the German naturalist Eduard Rüppell, who changed it to Sphyrna mokarran later that year" - what is "it"
  • "It" being the name; made it explicit
  • "However, for a long time" - vague, not encyclopedic wording
  • Changed to "over 200 years"
  • "coined" - are scientific names coined?
  • In the sense that the person who describes it picks the name, yes
  • "The lectotype for this species is a male from the Red Sea." - what does this mean?
  • A lectotype is a specimen chosen after a species has already been described, to serve as the type specimen for that species - I thought it'd be distracting to explain all this in the article
  • "the ancestral condition" - unclear what this means
  • The ancestral condition is the trait exhibited by the ancestors, in this case it means the earliest hammerheads had large cephalofoils - reworded to make this clearer
  • "Its presence is uncertain off Gambia, Guinea, Mauritania, Sierra Leone," - what does this mean?
  • It's what the IUCN report says; I'd interpret it as meaning that there are large hammerheads in those regions suspected to be great hammerheads, but identification is not 100% certain - I reworded the sentence
  • "documented as moving closer to the poles in the summer" - is this both north & south poles?
  • Yes - they follow warming water in the summer, which means northward in the northern hemisphere and southward in the southern hemisphere

Hope my notes are clear! —Mattisse (Talk) 22:33, 27 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Addressed comments; not sure whether you wanted me to change things for some of them or not. -- Yzx (talk) 23:13, 27 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Final GA review (see here for criteria)
  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose): Clearly written b (MoS): Follows the main MoS elements
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (references): References are good b (citations to reliable sources): They are reliable c (OR): No OR
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects): Covers major areas b (focused): Remains focused on the topic
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias: NPOV
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars etc.:
  6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
  7. Overall:
    Pass/Fail:
  • Congratulations! Good work.

Mattisse (Talk) 23:30, 27 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Great hammerhead. Please take a moment to review my edit. You may add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it, if I keep adding bad data, but formatting bugs should be reported instead. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether, but should be used as a last resort. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 17:31, 29 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]