Talk:Gold Dust Twins

This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Brands Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Brands, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of brands on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BrandsWikipedia:WikiProject BrandsTemplate:WikiProject BrandsBrands articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Marketing & Advertising Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Marketing & Advertising, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Marketing on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Marketing & AdvertisingWikipedia:WikiProject Marketing & AdvertisingTemplate:WikiProject Marketing & AdvertisingMarketing & Advertising articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the importance scale.

United States History Mid‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States History, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the history of the United States on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.United States HistoryWikipedia:WikiProject United States HistoryTemplate:WikiProject United States HistoryUnited States History articles

Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

This article has been marked as needing an infobox.

WikiProject United States History To-do:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Cleanup : United States History articles needing attention
Infobox : United States History articles needing infoboxes
Stubs : Stub-Class United States History articles, Category:United States history stubs
Other :
- Place either of the following WikiProject banners on United States History-related articles and assess:
  - {{WikiProject United States History|class=|importance=}}
  - {{WikiProject United States|class=|importance=|UShistory=Yes|UShistory-importance=}}

Discrimination Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Discrimination, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Discrimination on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.DiscriminationWikipedia:WikiProject DiscriminationTemplate:WikiProject DiscriminationDiscrimination articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the importance scale.

Short description[edit]

Hi @GenQuest, why do you insist on maintaining a short description that is neither short nor an accurate description of the article topic? Revirvlkodlaku (talk) 01:34, 25 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I only insist that there be a short description, there's a whole group of editors for that. Removing one without replacing it is just passing the buck to someone else. Anyway, I'll fix it. Thanks, GenQuest ^"scribble" 01:39, 25 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

What was wrong with the short description I added? Revirvlkodlaku (talk) 05:51, 25 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@GenQuest, please take the time to respond. Thank you. Revirvlkodlaku (talk) 15:16, 26 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nothing. Either is fine. GenQuest ^"scribble" 02:59, 27 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Caricatures[edit]

More needs to be added to this page regarding their effects as caricatures and stereotypes from the Jim Crow era. see this article. 66.195.146.66 (talk) 16:35, 6 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Paywalled. Unhelpful. GenQuest ^"scribble" 16:53, 6 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Paywalled sources are still valid sources. You seem more than a little defensive. Can you work collaboratively on this? awkwafaba (📥) 18:06, 6 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Can you see this source? awkwafaba (📥) 18:39, 6 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, I can. No one here's being defensive. But I suspect someone might be here to Right Great Wrongs. Slapping a maintenance tag on an article and then going silent with no explanation—as the IP did—when one can just as easily add findings to a new section of the article seems odd and a bit drama-filled. Regards, GenQuest ^"scribble" 15:18, 28 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]