Talk:Gol Gumbaz

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Untitled[edit]

i am micheal jackson vill bhatwaliya po baruna dist buxar i m reading in class 11th . i m from bihar

Hi, Satish singhaniya from 2016. Welcome to Wikipedia. I think you are describing Bhatwaliya village, Baruna and Buxar? It's often not a good idea to post personal details online; you don't need to, on Wikipedia. If you want any advice on editing, please post to my talk page, I'm happy to help. HLHJ (talk) 17:22, 15 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Did you know nomination[edit]

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: rejected by Z1720 (talk) 01:35, 31 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • ... that the Gol Gumbaz in Bijapur, India, had the largest dome in the Islamic world when it was constructed? Source: Mondini, Sara (2020-08-05), "The Jami Masjid Miḥrāb of Bijapur: Inscribing Turkic Identities in a Contested Space", Turkish History and Culture in India, BRILL, p. 294, ISBN 978-90-04-43736-4
    • ALT1: ... that the Gol Gumbaz in Bijapur, India, is one of the largest single-chamber structures in the world? Source: Alfieri, Bianca Maria (2000). Islamic architecture of the Indian subcontinent. F. Borromeo. London, WC: Laurence King Pub. p. 169. ISBN 81-85822-74-3. OCLC 44536138.
    • Reviewed:
    • Comment: *I've nominated this article in light of its recent expansion; this expansion was not five-fold but I hope it still warrants consideration because a lot of this expansion involved new and hook-worthy information with verifiable sources.
  • Unfortunately the only copy I could find of the source by Alfieri is a print edition so I can't link to anything here.

5x expanded by User:Gowhk8 (talk). Nominated by Gowhk8 (talk) at 04:33, 6 July 2022 (UTC).[reply]

Policy compliance:

Hook eligibility:

  • Cited: Yes
  • Interesting: Yes
  • Other problems: Yes
QPQ: Done.

Overall: A QPQ is not needed. Earwig shows a few things in the Archnet reference that can be reworded - "accessed by a staircase under the western entrance", "a flat section at its crown. The dome rests on", and "It is known as the 'whispering gallery". That is a minor issue, but the article hasn't been 5x expanded. A 5x expansion of its previous size of 1,206 characters would be 6,030 characters according to the DYK check tool. It is currently 4,447 characters long. At least 1,583 more characters are needed for a 5x expansion. I have seen exceptions for giving a longer period to complete a 5x expansion, but I haven't seen a less then 5x expansion be approved. ` SL93 (talk) 01:42, 17 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Gowhk8: Will you be able to address the concerns raised above? Narutolovehinata5 (talk · contributions) 00:05, 29 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Sorry for my late reply. While the concerns about paraphrasing seem like relatively easy fixes, I don't think I have any further information to add that would achieve a 5x expansion. Thanks anyway for the attention! Gowhk8 (talk) 03:35, 29 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@SL93: I guess this is a fail then? Narutolovehinata5 (talk · contributions) 06:30, 29 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Narutolovehinata5 I have now marked this as failed. SL93 (talk) 15:35, 30 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
I've closed this DYK nom as the nominator indicated that they do not think the article will be 5x expanded. Z1720 (talk) 01:35, 31 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]