Talk:God's Little Acre (film)
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
RE: Gung Ho ref.[edit]
A film cannnot technically evoke a feeling of something which POST DATES it... try a bit harder with syntax--Stephencdickson (talk) 15:43, 19 July 2010 (UTC)
NPOV[edit]
I have flagged this article as NPOV due to the last paragraph of this section being written in extremely non-neutral language, e.g. "The viewer should not be settled with the trite explanation of what God's little acre really is."
- I removed the POV tag that was placed on the article June 2008. There has been no discussion at all since it was placed.
- IMO the section of the article about what and where God's little acre really is gets into some far-fetched and unsourced explanations. I plan to delete most of it if no objection is raised. CBHA (talk) 17:37, 2 June 2009 (UTC)
What a fine essay....[edit]
The plot synopsis is chock full of film criticism. The section on the first scene (which I removed [1]) is an essay that appears as WP:OR. The final section (titled "Where is God's Little Acre" and also removed [2]) is similarly more essay than encyclopedia article.
I imagine that I've missed a critical comment or two. Phiwum (talk) 14:30, 30 June 2009 (UTC)
Also, "lensed"? Really? Stop verbing nouns. 198.53.208.74 (talk) 12:57, 23 February 2010 (UTC)
Copyright status[edit]
Previously this film was alleged to be in the public domain, apparently without taking into account its copyright and renewal registrations. It is possible that the renewal was not valid, but the fact of the renewal is now stated. Aardvarkzz (talk) 21:46, 17 January 2010 (UTC)
Frequently??[edit]
Quoting the article: "A box office failure upon first release, the film has frequently been aired on television."
I question the "frequently been aired on television" bit. Is there any source for this statement? CBHA (talk) 01:24, 23 November 2012 (UTC)
A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion[edit]
The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:
Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 07:34, 30 June 2021 (UTC)
Incoherent Plot Synopsis[edit]
The Plot Synopsis in this article is almost completely incoherent in its current form. It obviously has been edited to death, and sections that explained basic plot points seem to have been totally removed and not replaced.
IMHO, the entire article should be deprecated and replaced. I’m surprised to be first to point this out. 73.15.107.16 (talk) 06:00, 5 December 2022 (UTC)