Talk:GnuCash

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the GnuCash article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Archives: 1

Computing: Software / Free and open-source software Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Computing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of computers, computing, and information technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComputingWikipedia:WikiProject ComputingTemplate:WikiProject ComputingComputing articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Software.
	This article is supported by Free and open-source software (assessed as Low-importance).

Linux Low‑importance

	Linux portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Linux, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Linux on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LinuxWikipedia:WikiProject LinuxTemplate:WikiProject LinuxLinux articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Archives

Archive 1

flyingsolo is gratuitous self promotion[edit]

The section on Australia links to this site: http://www.flyingsolo.com.au/forums/working-smarter/5497-gnucash-accounting-software.html It's [sic] contribution to the article is marginal at best.wcrosbie (talk), Melbourne, Australia 10:36, 28 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Weak Area - Reporting - others thoughts??[edit]

I wish the article provided some indication about the quality of the GnuCash "Reporting" feature. While GnuCash does have reporting, I am wondering if anyone is finds it to be under-whelming and somewhat difficult to use? I say this as a long-time Quicken user. In my opinion, "Reporting" is the weakest part of an otherwise capable program - weak in both configurability and documentation (the latter being poor compared to the rest of the program). This is all my opinion, of course, and cannot be included in the article (unless some large number of us agree on this point of view?). Is anyone aware of any review that talks about the quality of the reporting compared to other programs? As an example, I'm trying to run a report in April of 2011 covering the year 2010's expenses - I can't seem to it! Dan Aquinas (talk) 01:21, 15 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on GnuCash. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Corrected formatting/usage for http://primates.ximian.com/~miguel/gnome-history.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 01:50, 30 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]