Talk:Gloucester and Sharpness Canal

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Gloucester and Sharpness Canal article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

England Low‑importance

	England portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject England, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of England on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EnglandWikipedia:WikiProject EnglandTemplate:WikiProject EnglandEngland-related articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Gloucestershire Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Gloucestershire, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Gloucestershire on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.GloucestershireWikipedia:WikiProject GloucestershireTemplate:WikiProject GloucestershireWikiProject Gloucestershire articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

UK Waterways Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject UK Waterways, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of UK Waterways on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.UK WaterwaysWikipedia:WikiProject UK WaterwaysTemplate:WikiProject UK WaterwaysUK Waterways articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Is this a plural, or a mistake?[edit]

Hello. In the rather excellent and interesting bit under the header "The Purton Hulks" we currently have this:

In 1909, following a collapse in the bank of the river, the Canal Companies chief engineer Mr A. J. Cullis called for old vessels to be run aground [...]

Do we mean that Mr Cullis was the chief engineer of "the canal company", or if you insist "the Canal Company"? Or was he the chief engineer of some body or affiliation that should correctly be referred to as "the Canal Companies"? Like that, plural, no possessive, with caps?? The article doesn't seem to help - I don't think there is much reference to the canal company, which would put it in context. For now, tll you what, I will be bold and change it to what I think might be more correct (singular, possessive, no caps) and then you can come and tell me what an idiot I am - which is fair enough (the good Lord knows it happens often enough!) as long as you tell me why I'm an idiot! :) Thanks and best wishes DBaK (talk) 07:29, 28 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Further to that, here are a Wayback Machine archive of the missing link and another associated page:

I will try to get these into the article - unless you beat me to it! :) Having said that I don't see anything there that convinces me I'm wrong in the change above. And this:

http://www.friendsofpurton.org.uk/

- might be useful too. Best wishes DBaK (talk) 07:44, 28 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Which end?[edit]

The article says By half way through 1799 ... only 5½ miles of the canal had been completed.

It would be jolly helpful to know which end this was. Afterbrunel (talk) 18:37, 30 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Gloucester and Sharpness Canal. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070928182017/http://www.virtualwaterways.co.uk/exhibition.php?eid=12 to http://www.virtualwaterways.co.uk/exhibition.php?eid=12

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 18:08, 6 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]