Talk:Glaive

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

§==Pop Culture List==

Carnildo wrote: Trivia/pop culture lists are evil, and tend to grow until they overwhelm the article

I do not beleive either of these statements are true. Pop culture lists are not evil, and I have never seen one overwhelm an article. I will admit they are sometimes unneccesary, and frequently too long, but I think you are exagerating.

Furthermore, it seems to me that a pop-culture section could be valuable in this particular article, because this whirling throwing-blade definition of "glaive" seems not to be limited to one movie. It occurs both in Krull, [1] and the Blade series. [2][3] Yes, these things are not "glaives" by any proper definition, but most people in our culture do not train for mêlée combat, and learn everything they know about weapons through movies. Shouldn't we at least acknowledge this definition of glaive, even if only to trash it?

Speaking of which, I seem to recall reading that there were at least three weapons which were actually historically called glaives. We probably should mention this too. --Iustinus 14:47, 30 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]

In regards to your first point, please see the second half of railgun. In regards to your second point, please see the second half of railgun. --Carnildo 19:12, 30 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]
I believe pop culture lists are entirely unnecessary, however I have neither seen one overwhelm an article nor swear an oath to Satan and begin practising arcane rituals late at night. I believe in this case simply stating what a glaive is qualifies as sufficient explanation, and there is no need to say "Despite what some believe, a glaive is not this that or the other". — Nicholas 07:24, 31 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]

OK, OK, allow me to change tack slightly. According to the OED, the word "glaive" has been used to describe basically three weapons throughout history:

  1. A lance or spear (examples cited from 1297-1592)
  2. A polearm similar to a "bill" or "halbert" (examples cited from 1450-1678)
  3. A sword (poetic, examples cited from 1470-1887)

Etymologically, "glaive" is usually assumed to come from Latin gladius and/or Celtic *cladivos, both of which mean "sword," yet in the earliest occurences of this word in French it is used in definition #1. Definition #2, the OED claims, is found only in English. Definition #3, I think, is the only one in Modern French (though I will happily take corrections on that). This was the "third point" in my original comment. I think we should definitely work this in somewhere in the article.

Now, as for the whirling blades, I did some more searching last night and I found further examples of this: [4] [5] [6]. From a purely descriptivist point of view, I think we have enough examples of this usage that we should at least mention it. And actually, as there are a number of sources we don't really have to mention any movies by name. --Iustinus 16:51, 31 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]

--

user:69.255.46.172 added the following:

In the RTS Warcraft 3 by Blizzard entertainment, it is a 3-sided large shuriken used by Night elves with huntresses throwing them, and Glave throwers (ballistas)
in another RTS, Starcraft, also by Blizzard, Zerg mutalisks spit "glave wurms" that bounce off targets and also look like 3-sided shurikens.

I have removed it per the compromise with Carnildo: we are mentioning the shuriken-boomerang use of the word "glaive" but not enumerating occurences. it is good to know of another such occurence, but we don't want to turn this article into a list, which could get very long (we already five), and afterall is dealing with a very specialized use of the term, to say the least. --Iustinus 00:06, 23 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

[[Image:NonFreeImageRemoved.svg -->|thumb|right|175px]] Seeing as there's a debate on having a pop culture list I'll discuss first. I'd like to add a mention of Sailor Saturn who is probably the most well-known example of a using an actual glaive in popular fiction. Her weapon is known as the "Silence Glaive" and there's an image here Leoroc 18:17, 6 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

-I'd like to comment in pop culture that the Award winning adventure game Okami made by capcom uses this word requently in place of the word "sword" to add vocabular veriety. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.246.137.199 (talk) 00:54, 30 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

According too Weapons a 2006 guide by DK a glaive is a polearm with a blade like a butterknife at the end. It is also similar to the japanese naginata.--Jesgreenleaf 13:25, 8 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]


Why was the popular culture list removed? It's gone from 'here's a list of occurrences of a weapon which happens to share it's name with a Glaive', to 'A Glaive is actually a circular object which returns to it's owners hand after thrown like a boomerang.'. Before, it's accurate and reasonable, now it's completely changed the meaning of the term. You could even do two articles if you wanted to given that the objects being referred to are completely different and in no way should be meshed together to suit a "I have a larger phallus so lets do this to the article" argument. Not on the same level as calling a Naginata and a Glaive the same thing, but getting there. Chrissd21 (talk) 12:01, 3 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Glaive as a Sword[edit]

This is mentioned above several times, but there are quite a few occurences of the word glaive referring to a type of sword, namely the type of gladius wielded by infantry of the Roman Legion. Quite a few serious sources mention this, and in fact, the American Heritage Dictionary of the English Language sets this as the only description of the term "Glaive". I recognize that the etymology of the term is a bit tricky but the link with gladius seems intuitively right. This article is too assertive in denying this, and does not cite sources for its assertions. I believe references to use of the term "Glaive" as meaning "a type of sword" should be inserted into the article. Edward Grefenstette 16:31, 13 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I assume that you are specifically talking about etymology, rather than semantics. But the article denies neither that glaive can sometimes mean sword, nor that it is probably from a Latin or Celtic word for sword. The point is simply that the earliest attestations of the word refer to spears rather than swords. As for sources, that section is based mostly on the OED (see the above discussion). I suppose I should annotate that.
It is interesting that the AHD defines glaive as "Archaic A sword, especially a broadsword." but note that it doesn't specify a Roman sword. Can you give me some sources on that? In English, I mean, because in Modern French glaive = Roman sword seems to be fairly common. --Iustinus 20:34, 13 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Indeed, I'm arguing the etymology. My edition of the OED gives the definition as "ORIGIN Middle English (denoting a lance or halberd): from Old French, apparently from Latin gladius ‘sword.’" I'd argue that this indicates shakey etymology, and both possibilities for the definition of Glaive should be included, based on the AHD's definition, and the correlation with the definition in other languages. After all, if it comes from a french word meaning 'sword', which comes from the latin word for 'sword', then it certainly deserves mention.
As for the AHD defintion, that was only my assumption based on the term Gladius. Edward Grefenstette 00:41, 14 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
actually glaive in french means a sturdy short sword, made for thrust and slash, as the roman infantry used. It seems strange that the only reference to a sword is as a poetic word for sword even in modern french. and that is quite false. [7]. saying that the ethymology from gladius to glaive is tricky seems bizarre at leaast. glaive comes from a latin word transfered into english. the transfert from gladius to glaive doesn't seems so strange. going from boeuf to beef doesn't move anyone...

Dumdedum[edit]

Just sticking this link here for future reference, some of these polearm articles need cleaning up [8] porges(talk) 02:27, 29 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

svärdstav[edit]

Not sure if the mention of Svärdstav is appropriate here.

According to the Swedish Royal Academy's Dictionary (http://g3.spraakdata.gu.se/saob/), Svärdstav has two meanings:

Loosely translated: 1) Under copper and early bronze age weapon with a dagger / sword shaped blade, mounted at a right angle on a staff about 1.5 meters long.

2) hollow cane containing a hidden sword.

The first definition could possibly be a Glaive, but the sentence looks romanticized and the description in the Dictionary does not match the design of a Glaive. The second definition is the one that i think most people would relate to as a svärdstav, and is absolutely not a Glaive.

I'm sure Glaives have been designed all over the world as some form of staff-mounted blade, but I don't understand why the Swedish version (if it indeed could be call a svärdstav) would deserve a special mention.

I'm going to take out the entry about the Swedish weapon, If someone has a compelling argument against this, go ahead and put it back in and state your case.

Popoi 02:00, 26 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Might make an interesting addition to Dagger-axe, the time period and description of the the first definition would be spot on, geography is another matter. KTo288 (talk) 10:11, 22 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Other[edit]

Plagiarism[edit]

This article, possibly in its entirety, appears to be copy-pasted from Tools of War: History of Weapons in Medieval Times by Syed Ramsey

https://books.google.com/books?id=tko5DAAAQBAJ&pg=PT85&lpg=PT85&dq=Champagne+saucer+glaive&source=bl&ots=q6cnlri1Ko&sig=gvmUxssuxa7F_Gw_dke8weCkO2k&hl=en&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwih59yNl_3QAhVBNSYKHdg_AmYQ6AEIPDAI#v=onepage&q=Champagne%20saucer%20glaive&f=false

Leehach (talk) 07:19, 18 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

In fiction[edit]

It would be good to expand upon than.

They fall into group of folding throwers that consists of two (fictional) classes (another class is folding shuriken). Premiered in the movie Krull, what originally meant a sword and became a polearm sometimes later, it represents a throwing blade that can be utilized as both a melee weapon and as a thrown weapon. It is a multi-bladed throwing implement whose blades could be folded into itself in order to give it a smaller form factor, presumably for easier transportation. They also seem to have a boomerang-like ability to come back to their wielder. Then it appeared in games, the first one being the video game adaptation of the movie itself, also titled Krull, launched in 1983 on the Atari 2600 platform. sharp frisbee. " In Old French, where the word glaive referred to most any kind of shafted weapon, the word carried a second meaning: it was used figuratively to describe the kind of destruction such a weapon imparts, specifically violent death. " [9] Most knowns examples are glaives from movies The Beastmaster (called caber or sth like that), Blade, Predator/Alien franchise. Setenzatsu (talk) 11:20, 16 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Connection to Baphomet[edit]

I came here from the wikipedia article on baphomet, which mentions that at least one historical image of baphomet shows him with a "glaive". I wondered what a glaive was, and came here. Noticed that the connection to Baphomet was missing, so I'm posting this on the chance that someone else thinks it should be included.2605:6000:6FC0:25:70F7:DBF:A3F2:E86D (talk) 04:20, 20 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hollywood “glaive”[edit]

It deserves a section (at least to clear up possible confusion).
"It is a multi-bladed throwing implement whose blades could be folded into itself in order to give it a smaller form factor, presumably for easier transportation. They also seem to have a boomerang-like ability to come back to their wielder. " It is featured in at least 3 movies: The Beastmaster, Krull, Blade. In the Beastaster movie, the protagonist uses a throwing weapon called a "caber". Blade uses 2: Shredder and Cyclone. 31.217.23.106 (talk) 21:16, 6 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

First drawing[edit]

The first drawing's text claims it illustrates several glaives. It. does. not. What it does illustrate is the blades (head) of some glaives. An analogy would be a drawing of the heads of six people with text claiming it illustrates people. Although it's worse in the case of glaives since the reader may not understand that their poles are not shown while I doubt anyone would believe that a head is a full person.174.130.71.156 (talk) 09:41, 11 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Where Roman Glaive short swords the first Glave pole arms?[edit]

When considering the mass and shape of a Roman Gladius/Glaive short sword it is quite possible that this sword was reforged into the Glave Polearm. In particular, a French Glave bears striking similarities. Has there been studies on the metallurgy of these Glave polearms? 204.144.215.204 (talk) 01:03, 22 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]