Gjeravica Lake is part of WikiProject Kosovo, an attempt to co-ordinate articles relating to Kosovo on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. If you are new to editing Wikipedia visit the welcome page so as to become familiar with the guidelines. If you would like to participate, please join the project and help with our open tasks.KosovoWikipedia:WikiProject KosovoTemplate:WikiProject KosovoKosovo articles
Gjeravica Lake is within the scope of WikiProject Lakes, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of lake-related articles on Wikipedia, using the tools on the project page. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LakesWikipedia:WikiProject LakesTemplate:WikiProject LakesLakes articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Serbia, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Serbia on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SerbiaWikipedia:WikiProject SerbiaTemplate:WikiProject SerbiaSerbia articles
The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the move request was: not moved.Number57 18:49, 27 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]
The article has been stable at its current location since 2008, what has changed?--Labattblueboy (talk) 04:57, 18 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]
I am finally getting round to clearing up the mess left by Balkan pov-warriors who were successful for several years. Is a string of undiscussed moves OK if one side gets the upper hand over the other for a longer period? I don't see any policy basis for such an approach. For what it's worth, I've also removed a lot of copyvio, of a similar vintage, in this area; should that be returned to article-space too since it went unnoticed for years? bobrayner (talk) 19:07, 26 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]
There are several back-and-forth moves in the page history, but as Labattblueboy notes, it has been at this title for a long time. Let's have a discussion here and try to establish a consensus title. Dekimasuよ! 06:30, 18 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]
By Article alert. Oppose, main article is Đeravica, so lake must be like that too. Also, Đeravica/Deravica is by far more COMMONANME then Gjeravica in sources. --Ąnαșταη (ταlκ) 22:28, 22 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per common name.--Zoupan 21:22, 23 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Dekimasu, why on earth did you move this page back to Đeravica Lake again, reverting @Anthony Appleyard:? If we're undoing a series of problematic undiscussed moves, shouldn't we return to the original title rather than give the advantage to the move-warriors? bobrayner (talk) 19:04, 26 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose - common name is Đeravica (although the Đ is often substituted with Dj or D when the keyboard doesn't have the character). Further, linguistically, the name's origin is from Serbia (compare with another location name further away: Đerdap), the word suffix is a common Slavic one, and "Gjeravica" is just the transcription of the word to the Albanian alphabet, where the first letter simply has been replaced with the closest sound in Albanian. - Anonimski (talk) 18:42, 27 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.
