Talk:Georgian Labour Party

	Politics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of politics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PoliticsWikipedia:WikiProject PoliticsTemplate:WikiProject Politicspolitics articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by Political parties task force.

Georgia (country)

	Georgia (country) portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Georgia (country), a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Georgia and Georgians on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Georgia (country)Wikipedia:WikiProject Georgia (country)Template:WikiProject Georgia (country)Georgia (country) articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Socialism

	Socialism portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Socialism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of socialism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SocialismWikipedia:WikiProject SocialismTemplate:WikiProject Socialismsocialism articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Untitled[edit]

why was the whole history of the party removed? admittedly it was messy and partisan but most of it was true and verifiable. i am researching georgian political parties myself(though i don't want to break the no original research rule so i'm not going to write the page). i find it strange that that a whole page should be obliterated when it could have just been cleaned. we need more not less on georgian politicsWillyD 11:14, 20 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The article needs some serious revision. It reads very much like party prop. --Kober 10:19, 22 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

This article had a copyright violation removed --Steve _(Stephen)^talk 10:13, 9 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This article is ridiculously bad on POV[edit]

This article reads like a piece of propaganda. Whole sections of the article are unsourced and read like praise pieces for the party. This article needs serious work.Jogarz1921 (talk) 02:41, 14 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]