Talk:G.I. Joe: Resolute

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

is this a valid reference?[edit]

The io9 reference, is a review before it aired, saying Adult Swim claimed it'd be more "sophisticated". Does that count as a third party review, if all they did, without having seen it yet, was repeat what the company line was, for what appears to be a brief blog entry? Dream Focus 21:00, 23 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Original research or common sense to mention the blood and death?[edit]

Need to form a consensus here, so everyone please give your opinions. If we add in something about there now being blood and people shown dying, would it be considered "original research" because no reviewer has said it, or can we think for ourselves, and agree that it is clearly there, and by rule of common sense add that in? Since that sort of thing has never happened before in the previous G.I. Joe series, I believe it is a very valid bit of information to have in the article. If there is no reasonable doubt about a fact, I believe it counts as common sense, and under the rules we can have it.

  • Add Add it in, its common sense, not original research. Dream Focus 21:48, 23 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Wait for a source. WP:DEADLINE - this is a new series, and certainly someone will say it eventually. Our own opinion about the aesthetics and content can wait -- esp. since blood and death are nothing new to the GI franchise (NB comics, animated TV movie). --EEMIV (talk) 23:14, 23 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Add. We don't need a reviewer to say there's blood any more than we need one to say that the cartoon is in color. --There are no names left (talk) 05:25, 2 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Add. The fact that you people even have to debate shit like this blows my mind.
  • I say there should be source to add about the subject.

Dwanyewest (talk) 16:21, 1 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Sequel[edit]

Have there been any interviews or comments that have hinted expansion on this new cotinuity? Does this have any connection to G.I. Joe: Renegades? 24.187.160.216 (talk) 21:01, 1 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Sources[edit]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on G.I. Joe: Resolute. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:53, 31 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified (January 2018)[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on G.I. Joe: Resolute. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 11:35, 21 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Article needs an episode table with episode summaries[edit]

This article is in desperate need of an episode table with episode summaries. --IJBall (contribstalk) 15:37, 13 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]