Talk:Fusilier

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Regarding Clothing[edit]

Er... this one sentence is bothering me. I would change it, but I am not British and honestly don't know if it is, perhaps, worded correctly.

     "In full dress fusilier officers only wore a bearskin."

I am assuming that fusilier officers wear more than a hat. Now, assuming that these fellows aren't walking around in the buff, shouldn't this sentence be reworded? Mr. G. Williams 03:17, 17 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]


What lacks here:[edit]

What lacks here: Etymology; fusil is the French word for rifle, so fusilier MAY literally mean rifle man. Anyone may expand this with citations to make one "Etymology" section of the article. Maybe it would also be very useful was there any information on a fusilier's modern designation. This could explain whether modern fusiliers are ceremonial or maybe they still fight in other countries. If the regimental designation has stopped entering combat in a certain time, when then? This may apply on the countries featured on the article. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Wickedcrane (talkcontribs) 12:51, 15 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Section on early Prussia in error[edit]

Contrary to the text, Prussia have had fusilier regiments since 1737. They were low-quality infantry raised from garrison companies, and were dressed in blue (not green) but with low mitre caps. See [1]. Geira (talk) 09:36, 26 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Royal York Fusiliers[edit]

Short-lived foreign corps or emigré unit in the 1790s. Garrison in fever-ridden West Indies —Preceding unsigned comment added by 85.85.148.202 (talk) 17:50, 16 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Bad definition[edit]

The article says that flintlocks were safer than matchlocks because the older weapon required a match to be lit near the breach, but the flintlocks used a flint. Yes, I know that there's a link to flintlock, but somebody just glancing through the article and unfamiliar with the terminology probably wouldn't understand. I'd be bold and just expand the passage to explain that while a matchlock was fired by touching a burning splint (match) to the touch-hole, the flintlock used a flint and steel to throw sparks on it, allowing the user to keep his hands clear, and aim more accurately. Before doing it, however, I'd like to see if anybody else has thoughts on this, or a possible better phrasing.JDZeff (talk) 20:18, 18 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Fusilier. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 11:50, 6 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Fusilier. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 02:11, 9 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]