Talk:Free State of Fiume

"Free State of Rijeka"

As a stamp collector in childhood, I recall the postage stamps of Fiume as a free state, with the lettering "Fiume". Is The Free State of Rijeka a post-facto partisan rewriting of history, or have I overlooked postage stamps or banknotes or official paper with such a title? --Wetman 02:58, 14 November 2005 (UTC)

Italian name is Fiume Crotian name is Rijeka. This has always been in last 1000 years. Greatest time of state short history true name has been Fiume, but only because state has been under Italian occupation. Italian has never spoken Rijeka, because slavic language has been not good enough for them. I think that Italian are having real language problem with saying words which has -ije-. My italian cousins because of that problem today ( and before ) call Rijeka Rika. rjecina

The both name were in use for the same city. During 19th century term - Fiume prevailed with italian laguage (dominant during that time)

State was established in 1920. occupied (or annexed) in 1924. So, it was de facto (till 1922.-military coup by fascist) & de iure (till 1924. - annexy) independent, and internationally recognized, not occupied. So, English translation of Stato libero di Fiume could be equally Free State of Fiume or Free State of Rijeka. contra1 06:50, 18 February 2006 (UTC)

In theory perhaps, but in practice, nearly all English-language history books call it the "Free State of Fiume". In a Google Books search, "Free State of Fiume" has 232 hits, versus 7 for "Free State of Rijeka". So I'd say that's pretty clearly the established name for the state in English. --Delirium 09:15, 10 November 2007 (UTC)

anarchist fascist?

This odd claim needs some explanation/clarification, or at the very least a citation. There's no such doctrine as anarcho-fascism. Indeed, they're polar opposites in political philosophy, and I've never read of a synthesis. 130.88.65.190 (talk) 09:44, 7 May 2008 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:Grbri130.gif

Image:Grbri130.gif is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 22:22, 13 February 2008 (UTC)

Blacklisted Links Found on the Main Page

Cyberbot II has detected that page contains external links that have either been globally or locally blacklisted. Links tend to be blacklisted because they have a history of being spammed, or are highly innappropriate for Wikipedia. This, however, doesn't necessarily mean it's spam, or not a good link. If the link is a good link, you may wish to request whitelisting by going to the request page for whitelisting. If you feel the link being caught by the blacklist is a false positive, or no longer needed on the blacklist, you may request the regex be removed or altered at the blacklist request page. If the link is blacklisted globally and you feel the above applies you may request to whitelist it using the before mentioned request page, or request it's removal, or alteration, at the request page on meta. When requesting whitelisting, be sure to supply the link to be whitelisted and wrap the link in nowiki tags. The whitelisting process can take its time so once a request has been filled out, you may set the invisible parameter on the tag to true. Please be aware that the bot will replace removed tags, and will remove misplaced tags regularly.

Below is a list of links that were found on the main page:

• http://www.fiume-stato.2ya.com/

  Triggered by \b2ya\.com\b on the global blacklist

• http://www.free-state-rijeka.2ya.com/

  Triggered by \b2ya\.com\b on the global blacklist

If you would like me to provide more information on the talk page, contact User:Cyberpower678 and ask him to program me with more info.

From your friendly hard working bot.—cyberbot II ^Notify_Online 17:40, 8 December 2013 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Free State of Fiume. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/20080907112739/http://www.rigocamerano.org/pqthnew.htm to http://www.rigocamerano.org/pqthnew.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 16:32, 13 January 2016 (UTC)