Talk:Fire and Emergency New Zealand

New Zealand Mid‑importance

	New Zealand portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject New Zealand, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of New Zealand and New Zealand-related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.New ZealandWikipedia:WikiProject New ZealandTemplate:WikiProject New ZealandNew Zealand articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Merge[edit]

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section. A summary of the conclusions reached follows.

The result of this discussion was… . Dont Merge

There's a lot of information on this page that duplicates that of the New Zealand Fire Service page, but the old NZFS page also carries more information. Perhaps the NZFS page needs to be merged here with a redirect, or perhaps the NZFS page should be stripped back to history and the FENZ page needs to become 'current' and pick over a lot of the more detailed 'current' information. A bit beyond my time capacity but worth considering. BlakJakNZ (talk) 03:59, 21 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose merge; better to keep the history of the long-standing Fire service where it is, and let the page for the new merged entity develop over time. Klbrain (talk) 20:43, 11 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Reverse To me New Zealand Fire Service and Fire and Emergency New Zealand are the same thing so I want to merge, but Fire Service article was created in 2005 and Fire and Emergency article was created in 2016 so Fire Service article has more history. I want to merge Fire and Emergency into Fire Service, move Fire and Emergency to project or user space without leaving a redirect and move Fire Service to Fire and Emergency. CityOfSails2 (talk) 23:24, 15 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose merge -- it seems as if the new agency was created out of multiple previous agencies and because of that it would make sense to me to keep both articles as they are. Epluribusunumyall (talk) 07:56, 27 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose merge. Different organisations with a different scope. Schwede 66 09:46, 3 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Pigeon Valley[edit]

Trimmed some numbers. Find it very odd that it started on 5/2, doubled overnight, but then was under control and extinguished on the surface by 6/2 - yet on 14/02 there are still 133 homes "off limits". I didn't follow the event, and haven't done any research - but as written here it's very puzzling. Hoping someone can clarify. - Snori (talk) 23:37, 6 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Commons files used on this page or its Wikidata item have been nominated for deletion[edit]

The following Wikimedia Commons files used on this page or its Wikidata item have been nominated for deletion:

Participate in the deletion discussions at the nomination pages linked above. —Community Tech bot (talk) 10:36, 11 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]