Talk:Fairy Gone

	Anime and manga portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Anime and manga, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of anime, manga, and related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Anime and mangaWikipedia:WikiProject Anime and mangaTemplate:WikiProject Anime and mangaanime and manga articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Requested move 12 February 2019[edit]

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: page moved. Anthony Appleyard (talk) 14:15, 16 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Fairy gone → Fairy Gone – The lower capitalization of the second word seems to be stylistic? "Fairy gone" (with that capitalization) could always be mentioned in the lede instead. Narutolovehinata5 ^tccsdnew 13:01, 12 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

It's a bit too soon really, since the work is not due to be released until April, the article was only created on 25 Jan, and the sole reference in the article is a press release from a WP:PRIMARYSOURCE. Most of my search results are secondary sources reporting the press release, and a slight majority conserve the lowercase "g". 178.164.162.144 (talk) 15:39, 12 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Release status and dates are utterly irrelevant; this is a MOS:TITLES and MOS:TM question, and the answer is unmistakeable. — SMcCandlish ☏ ¢ 😼 03:56, 14 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Support another eyesore stylism. In ictu oculi (talk) 19:39, 12 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Support per MOS:TITLES and MOS:TM. WP doesn't inject either lower or upper case where it does not belong in silly efforts to mimic trademark stylization. — SMcCandlish ☏ ¢ 😼 03:56, 14 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Support/Speedy move This is obviously a violation of MOS:TITLES._{ZXCVBNM (TALK)} 07:20, 15 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.