Talk:Fag stag

redirect

Stale

How do I redirect to "fag hag" —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 72.0.105.19 (talk • contribs) 04:58, 29 July 2005.

Do you have a cite for homosexual men being more accepted by straight men? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Heptapod (talk • contribs) 02:32, 27 December 2005.

Boo

Resolved

 – Article rewritten. -- Banjeboi 20:45, 2 November 2008 (UTC)

Dean is widely known as bisexual, Jake Shears is quite gay, and Elton John is so gay he it's absurd...I feel as though this designation is completely misunderstood. Chuchunezumi 08:43, 21 December 2006 (UTC)

i second this. someone needs to revise this article. (Stellrmn (talk) 08:08, 21 July 2008 (UTC))

I intend to but am dealing with other dramas first. Banjeboi 08:42, 21 July 2008 (UTC)

Update. I've started a rewrite and intend to only include those sourced as fag stag celebrities. Banjeboi 23:51, 23 July 2008 (UTC)

GA nom

I've nominated this for Good article status. -- Banjeboi 20:45, 2 November 2008 (UTC)

GA Review

This review is transcluded from Talk:Fag stag/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Starting to review, intial reaction is that there are some minor typographical errors to be addressed. -ΖαππερΝαππερ ^Babel_Alexandria 21:17, 14 November 2008 (UTC)

• Reference problems:
  • David's "Beyond the flamboyant Facade..." does not assert that this phrase's use has increased with acceptance of homosexuality or up to an international level.
  • likewise, Cohen's "Deconstructing fag hags" does not support the statement either, it is almost exclusively about the titular terms and does not discuss fag stag's growing usage.
  • Neither "gay-2-zee" nor "fantabulosa" discuss motivations.
  • you do not need two references for a single quote, it's only from either one or the other:
    • "[S]eeing who is tougher, stronger, who has the cooler car, and putting you down even though they say they are joking, but the gay guys I've met don't care about being 'manly' all the time"
    • "something every gay could stand to learn"
    • "are much better than straight people at carving a family out of their friendships"
• Style problems:
  • References are good, but you rarely need three at the end of a sentence if they are saying the same thing.
    • "'Fag Stag' was the name of a 2002 episode of the MTV series Undressed centered around a gay wedding."
  • Your image does not qualify as fair-use, and the license under CC is at best questionable... images of people, especially famous people, need to be released by either the person themself or an authoritative agent. Find something non-person or truly free use (i'm sure you can find a CC image on flikr better showcasing fag-stags).
  • the Coming out subsection is two sentences... this can surely be merged into the parent section.
  • define jargon like beard
• Go through and carefully typo-check, there are more than a few punctuation errors

-ΖαππερΝαππερ ^Babel_Alexandria 22:07, 14 November 2008 (UTC)

image question

The image of Colin Farrell that User:Zappernapper referenced doesn't need a "fair use rationale." If it's been created by someone else and released under an appropriate CC license, then it's okay to use on Wikipedia. If you have reason to believe that the uploader wasn't the creator or that the creator didn't release it under a CC license, then that should be brought up on the image's page on Commons. One could argue that the image doesn't need to be included in this article, but there's nothing prohibiting its inclusion here. I'm not sure what Wikipedia policy you're consulting about images of famous people needing to be released by the person or by the person's agent. Esrever ^(klaT) 16:05, 22 November 2008 (UTC)

actually, i do question the original uploader's tag, and i've placed a dispute tag on the image at commons. However, even should it turn out that the photographer really is releasing the photo under CC, we have a responsibility to not infringe on someone's personality rights. There are other ways to illustrate this term than with a picture of a celebrity, ways that wouldn't create an issue if the image were to be used for commercial purposes. -ΖαππερΝαππερ ^Babel_Alexandria 18:18, 22 November 2008 (UTC)

It's fine to dispute the image's copyright status, and I don't disagree that there are better ways to illustrate this article. My point was just that the image as it was uploaded didn't need a fair-use rationale. Esrever ^(klaT) 21:07, 22 November 2008 (UTC)

technically you are right, point taken, sometimes a quick comment is misleading -ΖαππερΝαππερ ^Babel_Alexandria 17:38, 23 November 2008 (UTC)

Fruit fly: used for women too?

This article mentions fruit flies, but personally, the only contexts in which I've heard fruit fly used has been in relation to women who have many gay males friends--essentially a less harsh-sounding term for fag hag. Perhaps it is less commonly used that way, but should some note be made of it in the article? Should fruit fly get its own article explaining the dual-gender use of it? --132.161.244.28 (talk) 05:06, 23 November 2011 (UTC)

Brought this up at Talk:fag hag. If anything FH has a stronger claim than FS since it actually has a reference listed for that. Ranze (talk) 07:37, 28 November 2015 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 2 external links on Fag stag. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/20081012105131/http://www.generationq.net/articles/Single-in-the-City-Fag-Stag-00001.html to http://www.generationq.net/articles/Single-in-the-City-Fag-Stag-00001.html
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/20090116031833/http://www.gay.com:80/news/roundups/package.html?sernum=6315 to http://www.gay.com/news/roundups/package.html?sernum=6315

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 21:56, 13 February 2016 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Fag stag. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.generationq.net/articles/Single-in-the-City-Fag-Stag-00001.html
• Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.gay.com/news/roundups/package.html?sernum=6315
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20071210091318/http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_qn4159/is_20031005/ai_n12746998 to http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_qn4159/is_20031005/ai_n12746998

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 13:37, 27 September 2017 (UTC)