Talk:Ext JS

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

[edit]

This page looks like an ad placed by the company. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 150.101.82.7 (talk) 02:15, 17 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]


I'm also thinking text like "Sencha experts will love the ease with which changes are refactored and how simple it is to trace code to the source" is just a shameless plug. --sentinelAlpha (talk) 00:15, 17 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Article name[edit]

This article should be named "Ext JS", because Ext is now the name of the company which markets several products, including Ext JS, Ext GWT and more. Olivier101 (talk) 15:55, 25 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Controversy: Is ExtJS really free?[edit]

On November 6th, 2018 Sencha announced their new community edition of Ext JS. This community edition (downloadble from their community edition website) is not open source as it does not have any OSI approved license. Instead, they use a pure proprietary licence agreement and have have dropped the open source license. The community license is can be used freely up to a product revenue of 10000 Euros. Hence I suggest to remove the GPL from the licenses on the main page. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Senarclens (talkcontribs) 09:14, 4 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]


NEWS: There is a library based on ExtJS that is called GeoExt that claims to be BSD License. How this should be possible is a big mystery to me. Katzlbt (talk) 06:29, 10 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Now that Ext is GPLv3, The information below is more for entertainment than substance.
* Is MySQL really free ? http://www.mysql.com/about/legal/licensing/
—Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.28.154.69 (talk) 19:29, 30 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
* http://mjg59.livejournal.com/84586.html
* ExtJS: When open source is not open at all
* http://reddit.com/r/reddit.com/info/6enr7/comments/
* http://www.nabble.com/Re:--Checkins--SVN:-z3c.formjs-branches-pcardune-extjs--creating-a%09branch-to-see-what-I-can-do-about-extjs-integration.-td16762911.html
* http://svn.zope.org/?rev=85246&view=rev (project dropped due to license issue)
* http://svn.zope.org/?rev=85248&view=rev (project dropped due to license issue)
* IRC log of #zope3-dev for Friday, 2008-04-18
* ExtJS Plugin for Struts2
80.156.46.53 (talk) 13:30, 10 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I've edited the article to reflect the licensing complexity and its interpretations. Martijn Faassen (talk) 11:54, 21 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
* http://extjs.com/forum/showthread.php?t=33096 - ExtJS 2.1 was just released (2008-04-20) and the license has changed to a more restrictive (but equally confusing) license. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.59.9.30 (talk) 22:35, 21 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I don't see how the Ext 2.1 situation is more confusing - it seems to be a fairly clear dual licensing model (GPL or commercial) now. I've updated the article. Martijn Faassen (talk) 00:13, 22 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Heh, well, the authors of Ext do like to make it more confusing. This is their interpretation: http://extjs.com/forum/showthread.php?p=156236#post156236
In my understanding of the GPL, if the GPL is used in a web application, that does not mean that all those who *use* the application will be able to ask for the source code under this license. Only those who you actually *give* the application you should also give the source code to, licensed under the GPL. Of course with javascript the situation makes it somewhat more confusing, as this runs on the client side. This would imply at least that all javascript code on the client falls under the GPL, but not necessarily any server-side code that generates it. Anyway, I don't care enough to really figure it out. Martijn Faassen (talk) 00:23, 22 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
* Ext Discovers Step 2 of the Slashdot Business Model?
* Does GPL make sense for AJAX libraries? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 88.157.60.245 (talk) 04:19, 24 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

"Ext" or "Ext JS"?[edit]

What is the name of the library? "Ext" or "Ext JS"? This article uses both. --Mortense (talk) 15:36, 23 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Template for Sencha products?[edit]

Can someone make a template for Sencha products? --78.160.17.125 (talk) 20:13, 1 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Ext JS. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 04:16, 20 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Ext JS. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 08:45, 28 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Maintenance and rating of JavaScript articles[edit]

Concerning editing and maintaining JavaScript-related articles...

Collaboration...[edit]

If you are interested in collaborating on JavaScript articles or would like to see where you could help, stop by Wikipedia:WikiProject JavaScript and feel free to add your name to the participants list. Both editors and programmers are welcome.

Where to list JavaScript articles[edit]

We've found over 300 JavaScript-related articles so far. If you come across any others, please add them to that list.

User scripts[edit]

The WikiProject is also taking on the organization of the Wikipedia community's user script support pages. If you are interested in helping to organize information on the user scripts (or are curious about what we are up to), let us know!

If you have need for a user script that does not yet exist, or you have a cool idea for a user script or gadget, you can post it at Wikipedia:User scripts/Requests. And if you are a JavaScript programmer, that's a great place to find tasks if you are bored.

How to report JavaScript articles in need of attention[edit]

If you come across a JavaScript article desperately in need of editor attention, and it's beyond your ability to handle, you can add it to our list of JavaScript-related articles that need attention.

Rating JavaScript articles[edit]

At the top of the talk page of most every JavaScript-related article is a WikiProject JavaScript template where you can record the quality class and importance of the article. Doing so will help the community track the stage of completion and watch the highest priority articles more closely.

Thank you. The Transhumanist 01:08, 12 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]