Talk:Europhoenix

This article was nominated for deletion on October 27 2016. The result of the discussion was Speedy Deleted per CSD G5.

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Europhoenix article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Trains: in UK Low‑importance

Trains Portal

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Trains, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to rail transport on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. See also: WikiProject Trains to do list and the Trains Portal.TrainsWikipedia:WikiProject TrainsTemplate:WikiProject Trainsrail transport articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Associated projects or task forces:
/
	This article is supported by WikiProject UK Railways (assessed as Low-importance).

September 2018 article recreate[edit]

Article re-create has issues: this is a content fork from a previous re-direct and likely does not do sufficient to avoid a re-presentation to AfD. This likely should be reverted to the re-direct unless the article recreator can losslessly and respectfully copy and integrate content from UK Rail Leasing#Europhoenix. Independent comments are welcome. Thankyou.12:35, 8 September 2018 (UTC)

The redirect is undone. The references on the content on the other article is disputed as original research and IP user has chosen not to merge and leave the WP:CFORK. It is therefore up to NPP to determine how to initially handle. I am concerned how an AfD or DRV reviews would treat this. I am happy for Europhoenix to have its own article, but concerned this incarnation may be deleted.Djm-leighpark (talk) 11:54, 15 September 2018 (UTC) a quick update to say on review I will certainly admit my citing for that section was rubbish for which I apologise, and is a valid reason for not merging content. I am concerned the article in its current state would be taken to AfD and even with improvements might be vulnerable (I think it has a case but the consensus may be different).Djm-leighpark (talk) 14:19, 15 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Following discussions on UK Rail Leasing#Europhoenix consensus was reached that Europhoenix was best moved from a section on UK Rail Leasing. To the best of my understanding the current article is a significant improvement on the pre-AfD incarnation (I can't recall if I have seen it or not) and there is an intent to improve it further. Thankyou. Djm-leighpark (talk) 21:40, 16 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]