Talk:Euro

Please place new discussions at the bottom of the talk page.

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Euro article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7: 180 days

Euro is a former featured article. Please see the links under Article milestones below for its original nomination page (for older articles, check the nomination archive) and why it was removed.

Euro has been listed as one of the Social sciences and society good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.

Article milestones
Date	Process	Result
January 19, 2004	Refreshing brilliant prose	Kept
February 23, 2006	Featured article review	Demoted
March 26, 2006	Good article nominee	Listed
June 15, 2009	Good article reassessment	Delisted
August 24, 2011	Good article nominee	Listed
Facts from this article were featured on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "On this day..." column on January 1, 2007, December 31, 2010, December 31, 2012, and December 31, 2016.
Current status: Former featured article, current good article

European Union Top‑importance

	European Union portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject European Union, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the European Union on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.European UnionWikipedia:WikiProject European UnionTemplate:WikiProject European UnionEuropean Union articles
Top	This article has been rated as Top-importance on the project's importance scale.

Numismatics Top‑importance

	Numismatics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Numismatics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of numismatics and currencies on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.NumismaticsWikipedia:WikiProject NumismaticsTemplate:WikiProject Numismaticsnumismatic articles
Top	This article has been rated as Top-importance on the project's importance scale.

Negatives[edit]

I see no mention of the arguments against the Euro, and little mention of the countries that have rejected it. Something that I think the article sorely needs for balance. 128.151.71.7 (talk) 15:20, 3 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

So go ahead and find a consensus of critical appraisals, written from a WP:Neutral point of view by wp:reliable sources, please. Then propose a draft here. You may find some starting points at optimum currency area. --𝕁𝕄𝔽 (talk) 17:35, 3 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

"Pros and Cons of the Euro" listed at Redirects for discussion[edit]

The redirect Pros and Cons of the Euro has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Readers of this page are welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 April 13 § Pros and Cons of the Euro until a consensus is reached. Dsuke1998AEOS (talk) 19:07, 13 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion[edit]

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:

Reverso 1 euro.jpg

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 08:08, 21 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Organizing the article[edit]

After the recent changes by Dasomm, the article has two very similar sections: Countries that use Euro and Direct and indirect usage. This isn't good for the article, especially considering that the section titled Countries that use Euro talks also about countries that don't use the euro. Any suggestions to fixing this? Merging the two sections? Vgbyp (talk) 14:10, 12 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I edit the article once again, I think now it looks better. Dasomm (talk) 11:30, 15 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, that's much better! Thank you! Vgbyp (talk) 09:46, 16 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]