Talk:Enumerator polynomial
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
Title[edit]
I would really prefer Weight enumerator (or possibly Weight enumerator polynomial) to enumerator polynomial. After all, the weights are the distinguishing thing, and there are many things a polynomial might enumerate otherwise. Richard Pinch (talk) 10:04, 11 July 2008 (UTC)
Error in Basic Properties[edit]
Does someone know why the first point under Basic Properties, is not shown as an image but instead as text? The code looks ok. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 129.125.21.76 (talk) 10:56, 16 September 2008 (UTC)
Automorphic forms proof and extension[edit]
McWilliams can be both extended and proved using automorphic forms. Does anyone think this is worth doing on this page? jbolden1517Talk 09:15, 16 March 2009 (UTC)
Why just binary?[edit]
Why is the article limited to binary codes? As far as I know, enumerator polynomial can be defined for any code. Also, MacWilliams identity holds for (linear?) codes over any finite field, not just F2. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 217.194.164.173 (talk) 12:55, 21 April 2013 (UTC)