Talk:Effects of Hurricane Isabel in Canada

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Effects of Hurricane Isabel in Canada redirect.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Effects of Hurricane Isabel in Canada was one of the Natural sciences good articles, but it has been removed from the list. There are suggestions below for improving the article to meet the good article criteria. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake.

Article milestones
Date	Process	Result
February 4, 2007	Good article nominee	Listed
April 13, 2007	Featured topic candidate	Promoted
May 29, 2008	Good article reassessment	Kept
April 18, 2013	Featured topic removal candidate	Demoted
April 18, 2013	Good article reassessment	Delisted
Current status: Delisted good article

GAC[edit]

I have graded this article on the following criteria:

Well-written: Pass
Factually accurate: Pass
Broad: Pass
Neutrally written: Pass
Stable: Pass
Well-referenced: Pass
Images: Pass

Therefore the article passes, and is promoted to Good Artilce. Jay32183 02:40, 17 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

GA Sweeps Review: Pass[edit]

As part of the WikiProject Good Articles, we're doing sweeps to go over all of the current GAs and see if they still meet the GA criteria. I'm specifically going over all of the "Meteorology and atmospheric sciences" articles. I believe the article currently meets the criteria and should remain listed as a Good article. Altogether the article is well-written and is still in great shape after its passing in 2007. Continue to improve the article making sure all new information is properly sourced and neutral. It would also be beneficial to go through the article and update all of the access dates of the inline citations and fix any dead links. If you have any questions, let me know on my talk page and I'll get back to you as soon as I can. I have updated the article history to reflect this review. Happy editing! --Nehrams2020 (talk) 19:01, 29 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Merge?[edit]

So, I've been thinking, the effects in Canada are so minimal. If that was a regular storm article that did that, it would've been merged years ago. I really don't think the content in there is any more than what could fit in the regular Hurricane Isabel article, which hasn't exceeded its size limits yet. ♫ Hurricanehink (talk) 23:38, 26 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Agree. I think it would totally fit into's Isabel main article.--12george1 (talk) 20:46, 16 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]