Talk:Edison Records/Archives/2017
 | This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Section headings
Section headings are too long.
Lots of long, underlinked, highly technical paragraphs. Edison Records was a record company and record label. How much is about that? How much is instead about the invention of records, recording, cyclinders, turntables? There are separate entries for those subjects.
–Vmavanti (talk) 15:21, 23 July 2016 (UTC)
- Actually, it's nothing about the company. What is very much failing is not only the original company name Edison Phonograph Company but also definitely information about the concurrents, being American Graphophone Company (who used the technique from the Volta Laboratory), North American Phonograph Company and of course Columbia (originally a subsidiary of North American, also using the technique of American Graphophone and Edison's). --SamWinchester000 (talk) 03:14, 18 March 2017 (UTC)
External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to one external link on Edison Records. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/20130518225840/http://americansoundarchive.com:80/ to http://www.americansoundarchive.com
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers. —cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 16:19, 17 October 2015 (UTC)