Talk:Duolingo

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Duolingo article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Archives: Index, 1: 365 days

This article is written in American English, which has its own spelling conventions (color, defense, traveled) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus.

This article was nominated for deletion on 24 March 2015 (UTC). The result of the discussion was keep.

This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Websites: Computing High‑importance

	This article is part of WikiProject Websites, an attempt to create and link together articles about the major websites on the web. To participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page.WebsitesWikipedia:WikiProject WebsitesTemplate:WikiProject WebsitesWebsites articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Computing.

Linguistics Low‑importance

	Linguistics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Linguistics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of linguistics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LinguisticsWikipedia:WikiProject LinguisticsTemplate:WikiProject LinguisticsLinguistics articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Companies High‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Companies, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of companies on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CompaniesWikipedia:WikiProject CompaniesTemplate:WikiProject Companiescompany articles

High This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject Companies To-do:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests : Wikipedia:Requested articles/Business and economics/Companies
Assess : Category:Unassessed company articles
Copyedit : Category:Company articles needing attention
Infobox : Category:Company articles needing infoboxes
Maintain : Portal:Companies
Stubs : Help expand stub articles located at Category:Company stubs
Other :
- Tag company articles with the {{portal|Companies}} template
- Tag company talk pages with the {{WikiProject Companies}} project banner
- Answer requests for comments

Apps Mid‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Apps, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of apps on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.AppsWikipedia:WikiProject AppsTemplate:WikiProject Appsapps articles

Mid

This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the importance scale.

Contribute to the project:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Good article nominations : Improve Application software, Facebook and Instagram to good article status
Stubs : Category:Mobile game stubs, Category:Stub-Class apps articles

Daily pageviews of this article

A graph should have been displayed here but graphs are temporarily disabled. Until they are enabled again, visit the interactive graph at pageviews.wmcloud.org

What to add[edit]

They should say it sends too many notifications and that it says it is free but will force you to pay. 113.254.69.211 (talk) 09:31, 26 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This is your opinion. Do you have a reliable secondary source? סשס Grimmchild 14:48, 28 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I can confirm that the Android app issues a system-level notification after the completion of each exercise. It's wackily unnecessary. (What were they thinking?) I'm sure millions of users routinely turn off Notifications before running it. However, the app never "forces you to pay", as the OP claims.

– AndyFielding (talk) 09:16, 5 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

They literally say their mission is free education for millions - while charging for super Duolingo and Duolingo max - having removed a ton of educational content from the free version in order to only offer it with the paid versions (thus charging money for something which they’ve confirmed the value of as $0.00 and which they literally say in their own mission statement is supposed to be free). This wouldn’t be offensive if they changed their mission statement at the same time that they removed all that free educational content and made it paid-content, but they didn’t. So now their mission statement is just a lie, and they’re the kind of smug buttholes who continue to think highly of themselves even after they removed the educational opportunities from those they set out to help. It wouldn’t look like unapologetic greed if they were upfront about this app not actually being free while also offering the educational services they purport to offer on the free version, and instead just acknowledged that they’re not trying to freely help anyone and this app has always been designed with ‘making money’ as the mission. 2601:642:C500:B8C0:DD77:F9BB:709F:AE25 (talk) 08:13, 24 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Number of languages[edit]

This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request.

In the third paragraph in the introduction, change "…, teaching over 100 languages, …" to "…, teaching over 40 languages, …". Not sure where the Number 100 comes from, it's not in the cited article and even the list of courses available under "Services > Duolingo language app" only has 43 entries. Oriides (talk) 10:24, 29 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Done Actualcpscm (talk) 10:42, 29 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Duolingo age[edit]

It need changing to 11 year Boomiholic (talk) 17:19, 20 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Wiki Education assignment: Research Process and Methodology - FA23 - Sect 202 - Thu[edit]

This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 6 September 2023 and 14 December 2023. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): CORNELIAST (article contribs).

— Assignment last updated by CORNELIAST (talk) 23:12, 2 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Duostories[edit]

Hiya, I've blank-and-redirected the page Duostories to here. I do not think there is much to merge. Justi yaya 13:19, 5 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

That term should probably be explained on this page. -- Beland (talk) 22:32, 7 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected edit request on 14 January 2024[edit]

This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request.

Please update to include: Duolingo's customer support is extremely limited and they are only reachable by email, often with a disclaimer that they will not reply to you. Their premium subscription services do not provide an increase in support services.

They are not BBB accredited and have an F rating, with on-brand replies to complaints that regularly place blame on the user.

Source: https://www.bbb.org/us/pa/pittsburgh/profile/language-training-aids/duolingo-0141-71020747/customer-reviews

Buyer beware on their subscription services. At >$80 price point, if you use any feature or press any button on premium after the trial period, they will not refund you. And there is no meaningful notice in the app that this has occurred. Proctor of the people (talk) 14:04, 14 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Not done: Request fails WP:NPOV, unreliable source provided, and irrelivant critique. EphemeralPerpetuals (they/them)^talk 14:53, 14 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Studies[edit]

"Recent studies demonstrated that after 120 hours of using the app, Duolingo learners’ scores on reading and listening tests match university students who completed four semesters, or roughly 240 hours, of language study." [1] Benjamin (talk) 01:40, 16 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Needs an WP:INDEPENDENT source. Pyrrho the Skipper (talk) 15:45, 16 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Duolingo Math Ending[edit]

In the same update that Duolingo Music was added (The Duolingo App Now Has Math, Music, and Language) Math was moved to the same Duolingo app and the stand-alone math app was taken off the App Store, shouldn't it be updated? And I can't do it because I made my account yesterday. Sonic782804 (talk) 08:14, 27 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected edit request on 29 January 2024[edit]

This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request.

Please update the Duolingo Math section to mention it being discontinued and migrating under the main Duolingo app. Mabye from Duolingo Math is a mobile app for learning elementary mathematics in a form similar to the original app, released in October 2022. It is currently only available on iOS device. To something like Duolingo Math was a mobile app for learning elementary mathematics in a form similar to the original app, released in October 2022. It was only available on iOS devices before migrating the base Duolingo app. Source: https://blog.duolingo.com/new-subjects/ Sonic782804 (talk) 13:15, 29 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Not done: please provide reliable sources that support the change you want to be made. A blog is hardly a reliable source, even less so from the company itself. I'm sure there are reliable sources covering this. ― Blaze Wolf^Talk_{blaze__wolf} 13:25, 29 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Wait, why would a Duolingo blog post be an unreliable source for basic info about access to their products? This take goes pretty hard against WP:ABOUTSELF. — HTGS (talk) 21:51, 29 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Blaze Wolf: We can definitely source basic, uncontroversial information to the article subject – see WP:ABOUTSELF. — kashmīrī ^TALK 22:26, 29 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Determining whether a fact is encyclopedic, however, should consider if the sources are independent or not, though. That's how an article becomes a WP:BROCHURE Pyrrho the Skipper (talk) 22:30, 29 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I see no such risk with the change proposed by Sonic – a simple correction of outdated information. — kashmīrī ^TALK 23:04, 29 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Pyrrho the Skipper, do you mean we shouldn’t list the current access method to the (well-notable) math module? Because if you just wanted to remove mention of the now-defunct app that makes some sense, but most coverage of the product was published when it was released as its own app, so delineating the transition seems like it would be helpful to readers who have only seen coverage describing that initial launch. It also seems kinda petty to quibble with a newbie over whether to include such a minor note. — HTGS (talk) 00:06, 30 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I was wondering that, too, and I agree the edit should be updated rather than removed. It might of even been me that added the original news. Pyrrho the Skipper (talk) 00:10, 30 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I'm aware that WP:ABOUTSELF is a thing, however if there are reliable sources to be found then they should be used instead. ― Blaze Wolf^Talk_{blaze__wolf} 11:43, 30 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]