Talk:Dunav osiguranje

This article was nominated for deletion on 17 March 2017. The result of the discussion was keep.

The following Wikipedia contributor has declared a personal or professional connection to the subject of this article. Relevant policies and guidelines may include conflict of interest, autobiography, and neutral point of view.

Mihailo79 (talk · contribs) This user has contributed to the article.

Why delete?[edit]

This article is proposed for deletation. Can somebody tell me why? What seems to be the problem? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mihailo79 (talk • contribs) 17:44, 20 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Cancer protect[edit]

Dunav osiguranje is the only insurance company in the World that has this product. It is rarity so it should be on Wiki. Mihailo79 (talk) 07:09, 1 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Terorism risks[edit]

Only few insurance companies cover this risk. Dunav osiguranje is one of tham. That is for Wiki. Mihailo79 (talk) 07:09, 1 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

It is not. You only provided a primary source, so it has to go. And, once again, WTF is with that gallery?? You can't be serious. BytEfLUSh _Talk 07:16, 1 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The gallery was the heart and soul of Dunav osiguranje wiki english page. Without the gallery it is not that page. Mihailo79 (talk) 08:12, 1 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Images in a Wikipedia article should relate directly to the subject of the article, and the images in the gallery did not do that. There were two pictures of the company headquarters, and one of them could perhaps be used (the one showing the whole building, not the one with a guy in a window). The others were at best tangentially related (a picture of a membership card does not really add any information) and in several cases completely random (a woman walking, the Williams sisters on the tennis court, a man drinking coffee). So no, I'm afraid I disagree strongly with the claim that the gallery was the soul of the page. --bonadea contributions talk 11:58, 1 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I know that Company, i have worked ther, maybe still working. I can feel the Company, it is information from the source, from the first hand. Acctualy, that guy is me. Mihailo79 (talk) 13:58, 1 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Mihailo79: You are quickly heading towards being indefinitely blocked. --NeilN ^{talk to me} 14:08, 1 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@NeilN: I feel you brother. P.S. I apologize for the informality.--AirWolf ^talk 22:32, 1 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

You are doing against the Wiki principals. One of the basic principal is good will. You have your personal problems, issues and because of that you are changing somthing that is good, beautiful. I feel sorry for you. Mihailo79 (talk) 07:42, 2 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Assuming good faith only goes so far. You still haven't addressed the issues with your editing. BytEfLUSh _Talk 07:47, 2 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Here we dont have a problem with the facts, but with the style. Wiki community should leave the freedom to make stylish pages that are attracitve for reading and not to be steryle and boaring for looking and reading. Rarity information, unique products in this case, is something that should be on wikipedia, something that is interesting for readers. If you wach like that, you could say it is also part of marketing. Yes it is, but it is also unique and because of it, it is for Wikipedia. Mihailo79 (talk) 08:54, 2 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Leave stylishness, attractiveness for company's website and company's PR. Wikipedia is not a place for it. I won't argument any further, obviously you are not taking advice from other, more experienced editors.--AirWolf ^talk 22:53, 2 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]