Talk:Domestic partnership in Washington (state)

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The 2009 passing of domestic partnerships[edit]

I have heared that the 2009 domestic partnership bill passed, what happens now and can that be verified? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 122.148.207.230 (talk) 12:21, 12 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Latest status[edit]

What is the latest status on the "everything but marriage bill" (the 2009 stage 3 domestic partnership bill)? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 122.148.207.230 (talk) 08:24, 15 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]


With the bill being approved by about 104,000 votes, and only 32,000 votes left to be counted, it looks like R-71 will be approved. Dobby421 (talk) 06:38, 11 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Update[edit]

The whole page needs to be updated now please. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 122.148.207.230 (talk) 09:25, 16 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Not law yet![edit]

The Gov. has not signed the bill into law as of today! I have corrected the page. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 122.148.207.230 (talk) 07:55, 3 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

News[edit]

First of all, no one on this page is signing their posts. Second of all, if Governor Gregoire has indicated she will sign the bill into law, why has she held onto the bill for over 2 weeks? Isn't she going to... sign ...it? What's the hold up? -Laikalynx (talk) 00:04, 11 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Now that I've looked, I can see it's the same IP. To sign your post use 4 tildas (~). Laikalynx (talk) 00:06, 11 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Results of R-71 not certified until Wed, Sept. 2[edit]

As of this moment, the count has been completed but the results are not certified. Also, a King County Superior Court judge is expected to rule on the validity of about 35,000 signatures turned in without a legally required statement by the actual signature gatherer (some were turned in unsigned, many were "signed" via signature stamp by the referendum sponsor.) That ruling may bar the Secretary of State from certifying the results. In other words, the status of R-71 is still very much up in the air.

See http://seattletimes.nwsource.com/html/politics/2009782506_referendum01m.html

TechBear (talk) 16:46, 1 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Move discussion in progress[edit]

There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:Capital punishment in Washington which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you. —RMCD bot 11:36, 3 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Domestic Partnership Changes?[edit]

Hi, So, over on [1], I think that the Washington section needs to be updated in light of recent events. I don't know enough about the topic feel comfortable changing things, so I hope someone here can do it? Thanks! (10 Dec 2012) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2001:470:B:6B5:21C:B3FF:FEB9:8E75 (talk) 20:12, 10 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Domestic partnership in Washington (state). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:14, 14 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 8 external links on Domestic partnership in Washington (state). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 06:12, 12 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Domestic_partnership_in_Washington_(state)&oldid=1207003537"