Talk:Diversity (business)/Archives/2012

Discuss Merger at Diversity (politics)

Please bring your opinions to Talk: Diversity (politics)#Merge with Diversity (business) Lasalle202 00:23, 21 August 2007 (UTC) I understand the link problem. I think we can get around it with proper references. We will try again. Lars —Preceding unsigned comment added by Bohmanlars (talk • contribs) 04:23, 30 November 2008 (UTC)

All employers can have a reason

"no application at all to employers NOT in global markets," - this is patently false if part of the diversity business plan is to impact employee engagement - every company that has employees can theoretically gain. If no citation is provided in a week, the claim will be removed. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 207.69.137.23 (talk) 00:31, August 21, 2007 (UTC)

statement has been removed —Preceding unsigned comment added by 207.69.137.36 (talk) 01:02, August 29, 2007 (UTC)

Too focussed on demographics?

This article seems to only consider the more obvious facets of diversification - namely those such as gender, skin colour etc. However diversity policies also consider the benefits of diversity on many more levels, such as background and experience - forming arguments against, for example, organisations being comprised solely of PhDs, or Harvard graduates, or people who have all gained their experience within the same industry, or worked they way up from shop floor etc. Shouldn't the diversity variables covered be more diverse? Paul45 (talk) 16:04, 29 September 2009 (UTC)

Ageism in particular is a growing problem and should be included into the sphere of diversity discussion. 69.174.171.59 (talk)