Talk:Diet for a New America (album)

This article was nominated for deletion on 20 March 2009 (UTC). The result of the discussion was keep.

This article along has been suggested for speedy deletion whilst meeting none of the criteria. "This criterion applies only to articles about web content and to articles about people and organizations themselves, not to articles about their books, albums, software and so on." DrMotley (talk) 00:54, 19 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The new template someone has added states that the issues will be discussed on the talk page, but I completly fail to see how this article "does not indicate the importance or significance of the subject". Now, im perfectly willing to make changes but with no idea of what is wanted I have no way to fix it DrMotley (talk) 00:23, 20 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please see WP:MUSIC for notability criteria for a music album. If it does not meet the criteria to be a notable album, then it will be deleted. If it does meet the criteria to be a notable album, then please include, within the article, the references that establish such notability. Untick (talk) 00:58, 20 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Well, i have read that article and if i may quote "In general, if the musician or ensemble that recorded an album is considered notable, then officially released albums may have sufficient notability to have individual articles on Wikipedia." The main songwriter/musician in the band 58 is Nikki Sixx of Motley Crue fame, who are defiantly of notability as is Nikki Sixx as not only is he involved in Motley Crue, Sixx AM, and 58 but also runs Seven Eleven Music. This article meets the notability criteria. DrMotley (talk) 01:23, 20 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I removed it because i am trying to discuss the matter but you would not reply about what it is you apparently expect even though i have shown in the guidelines you provided that this article does not meet the deletion critera, and in case there really was something needed on the article i addded that Nikki sixx is a member of the group and internally linked the page, the way you are acting is not justified in this case and I would suggest that you either leave real reasoning as to how/why the article needs improving or you remove the deletion propsal. DrMotley (talk) 13:44, 20 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]