Talk:Devil's Punch Bowl

Surrey Mid‑importance

	Surrey portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Surrey, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Surrey on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SurreyWikipedia:WikiProject SurreyTemplate:WikiProject SurreySurrey-related articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

UK geography Mid‑importance

	United Kingdom portal This article falls within the scope of WikiProject UK geography, a user-group dedicated to building a comprehensive and quality guide to places in the United Kingdom on Wikipedia. If you wish to participate, share ideas or merely get tips you can join us at the project page where there are resources, to do lists and guidelines on how to write about settlements.UK geographyWikipedia:WikiProject UK geographyTemplate:WikiProject UK geographyUK geography articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

You have confused Devil's Punchbowl with Devil's Dyke in Sussex -- 195.234.243.2

See the Devil's Dyke, Sussex article --Grstain 13:48, 6 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I have been to the devils puchbowl as a school trip, stayed there for a week, a truly beautiful and stunning place.

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 4 external links on Devil's Punch Bowl. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Y An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 18:07, 9 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move 11 August 2019[edit]

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: no consensus (closed by non-admin page mover) Calidum 12:21, 25 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

– Clear absence of a primary topic in light of the existence of articles like Devil's Punchbowl (Angeles National Forest) and Devil's Punch Bowl (Hamilton, Ontario), and the fact that the dab page receives over a quarter of the main article's traffic [1]. – Uanfala (talk) 14:34, 11 August 2019 (UTC) --Relisting. Steven Crossin ^{Help resolve disputes!} 15:34, 18 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Weak support per views [[2]] while the DAB oddly gets so many views (its usually about 1% for most DABs ending in "(disambiguation)") but the Canadian one gets less than half the views of the Surrey one and the LA one has a slightly different name but I don't think that there's a clear PT overall. That said it should be moved to Devil's Punch Bowl, Surrey per WP:UKPLACE. Crouch, Swale (talk) 16:47, 11 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose. Primary topic can be established by long-term significance: "The name Devil's Punch Bowl dates from at least 1768". Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 17:58, 12 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose. Clear primary topic. -- Necrothesp (talk) 12:45, 14 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Comment by relister - I'd like to see further, more substantial policy weighted discussion on this one before I, or another closes this one. I am unable to make a clear determination either way at this stage. Steven Crossin ^{Help resolve disputes!} 15:34, 18 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Primary topic from its long history.Charles (talk) 21:39, 18 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

National Trust pilot[edit]

Hello! During late June, July and some of August, I'm working on a paid project sponsored by the National Trust to review and enhance coverage of NT sites. You can find the pilot edits here, as well as a statement and contact details for the National Trust. I am leaving this message when I make a first edit to a page; please do get in touch if you have any concerns. Lajmmoore (talk) 07:34, 4 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]