Talk:Desigual

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Brands, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of brands on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BrandsWikipedia:WikiProject BrandsTemplate:WikiProject BrandsBrands articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Fashion Low‑importance

	Fashion portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Fashion, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Fashion on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.FashionWikipedia:WikiProject FashionTemplate:WikiProject Fashionfashion articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

The Wikimedia Foundation's Terms of Use require that editors disclose their "employer, client, and affiliation" with respect to any paid contribution; see WP:PAID. For advice about reviewing paid contributions, see WP:COIRESPONSE.

Ursulabela (talk · contribs) has been paid by Hill&Knowlton on behalf of Desigual.

This article is dedicated to present a spanish clothing brand that is growing very fast in Western Europe today. It's just the begining of the article and other references and analyzes will be added in the future. The brand is in the same market as other spanish companies like Zara, Mango that already have their article on Wikipedia, if this article is deleted so all articles regarding clothing brands should be deleted to be fair...

The problem is, that the article is written like a blatant advertisement. This project is an encyclopedia, not a place for promotion of your products.--Vejvančický (talk) 06:18, 30 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not promoting my product, I'm just a french guy writing on a brand I discovered 2 years ago and that is becoming a big marketing and clothing phenomenon! I tried to write the article in nice english words (what you call blatant), maybe I should be more factual, I'll try to do this! —Preceding unsigned comment added by Karochky (talk • contribs) 06:26, 30 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Please, could you rewrite the article in a more factual and neutral way? Don't forget to cite independent and reliable references. I'll remove the tag. --Vejvančický (talk) 06:36, 30 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Ok I'll do that, I already changed some sentences in a more factual way. I'll look for more independent and reliable references. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Karochky (talk • contribs) 06:39, 30 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

You can look for possible sources here: [1], [2]. Try to avoid press releases and blogs, as they are not considered as reliable sources.--Vejvančický (talk) 06:54, 30 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

OK thanx for your help! —Preceding unsigned comment added by Karochky (talk • contribs) 07:44, 30 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Desigual. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 11:03, 9 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Major restructuring[edit]

I did a complete remodeling of the article trying to provide as much information as possible and avoiding that this information was a pamphlet or advertising brochure. With the help of the editors :Deb and :David notMD, whom I thank for their contributions, I have cleaned the article of phrases that could sound like marketing and we have introduced the history of the company in the second heading. They also helped me to write some phrases in a more neutral way in both the Sustainable Production and the Brand Image sections. On Deb's recommendation I have looked up all the necessary references on alliances. We have also deleted the list of the 107 countries in the commercial network and only provided the most significant ones along with the necessary references. It would be good to have other editors reading this because my eyesight is already blurred and I can't see the errors anymore. In any case, I am removing the label "under construction or remodeling". --Ursulabela (talk) 16:50, 17 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]