Talk:Derek Kellogg

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Derek Kellogg. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 12:17, 11 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Firing Derek Kellogg section[edit]

Derek Kellogg is a college coach which is an entertainment business. As such mentioning fans desires to have him fired is not vandalism. It is akin to putting ratings for TV shows or movies I to a post. No different than saying xyz movie was not well received by fans. It is relevant information.

Your repeated rolling back of an appropriately cited and non-biased entry relevant to his career is vandalism. Repeated attempts to censor this section will result in filing for arbitration and requesting that your account be sanctioned for vandalism 2nd to your censoring of properly cited information. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.151.24.35 (talk) 02:21, 10 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The new "Some Fans Push to Fire Kellogg" section does not belong on a Wikipedia page. Though it does have some factual information, most of it is based on opinions of only some of the team's fans. Several of the citations point to internet message board content, which is also opinionated and should not be used as a source.MikeUMA (talk) 04:11, 21 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I agree....Pvmoutside (talk) 22:46, 21 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Content about fans is not really encyclopaedic and you're gonna need more reliable sources than the ones you've provided. The Ninja5 Empire (Talk) 04:53, 6 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]