Talk:Der Mann aus Stahl

	Film portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Film. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see lists of open tasks and regional and topical task forces. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the guidelines.FilmWikipedia:WikiProject FilmTemplate:WikiProject Filmfilm articles
	This article is supported by the German cinema task force.
	This article is supported by the Silent films task force.
	This article needs an image (preferably free) related to the subject, such as a picture of the set or a film poster. Please ensure that non-free content guidelines are properly observed.

Requested move 2 July 2019[edit]

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: not moved. Most editors believe that The Man of Steel (film) would be too easily confused with Man of Steel (film). (non-admin closure) — Newslinger talk 10:13, 9 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The Man of Steel (1922 film) → The Man of Steel (film) – The better known 2013 film is titled Man of Steel; the lack of the helps disambiguation. Kailash29792 (talk) 09:22, 2 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Strong oppose who is going to know that Der Mann aus Stahl has or doesn't have a "The" in English? Leave well alone. In ictu oculi (talk) 12:39, 2 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per WP:SMALLDETAILS. Lugnuts ^{Fire Walk with Me} 14:58, 2 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Support. The article on the Superman film is not at Man of Steel (2013 film), so the current setup seems a little contradictory. In any case, hatnotes are enough in this scenario. Nohomersryan (talk) 17:46, 2 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose - I'd be more inclines to add 2013 to Man of Steel (film) than to move this silent film to a slightly more unclear title. I don't think the initial article is a large enough detail because someone searching for the 2103 film could easily try to use "The Man of Steel". Should really hatnote both articles. -- Netoholic @ 18:15, 2 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose proposal and support adding 2013 to Man of Steel (film) as current setup indeed does not make sense. --Gonnym (talk) 22:59, 2 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Comment: If this is how the RM is progressing, how should the sequel to 2016's Suicide Squad, which is The Suicide Squad, be titled? The Suicide Squad (film) or The Suicide Squad (2021 film)? So should the 2016 film's article be re-titled too? If yes, I may agree with your views that The Man of Steel (1922 film) should remain unmoved. --Kailash29792 (talk) 08:04, 3 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
- They're literally calling the sequel of Suicide Squad, The Suicide Squad? Wow. (to answer your question, I'd disambiguate those as well, same issue). --Gonnym (talk) 10:12, 3 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  - But see also Predator (film) and The Predator (film). PC78 (talk) 11:17, 6 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.