Talk:Dena Grayson

This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.

If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.

Articles for creation

	This article was reviewed by member(s) of WikiProject Articles for creation. The project works to allow users to contribute quality articles and media files to the encyclopedia and track their progress as they are developed. To participate, please visit the project page for more information.Articles for creationWikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creationTemplate:WikiProject Articles for creationAfC articles
	This article was accepted from this draft on 29 July 2015 by reviewer Sulfurboy (talk · contribs).

Biography: Politics and Government / Science and Academia

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article is supported by the politics and government work group.
	This article is supported by the science and academia work group.

Politics: American Low‑importance

	Politics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of politics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PoliticsWikipedia:WikiProject PoliticsTemplate:WikiProject Politicspolitics articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by American politics task force.

Women scientists

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women scientists, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Women in science on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women scientistsWikipedia:WikiProject Women scientistsTemplate:WikiProject Women scientistsWomen scientists articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Florida

	Florida portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Florida. If you would like to join us, please visit the project page; if you have any questions, please consult the FAQ.FloridaWikipedia:WikiProject FloridaTemplate:WikiProject FloridaFlorida articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Comments[edit]

Comments directly below in the Contested deletion section have been merged here from Draft:Dena Minning. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 12:01, 12 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Contested deletion[edit]

This article should not be speedily deleted for lack of asserted importance because... I'm still in the process of writing it. I would like some more time to write it, as I am learning the citation rules as I go. The person in the article is possibly going to be running for a Congress seat and also has been part of teams working on a cure for Ebola. Both of which I personally think are notable, especially if the first also comes true. --Fayrfayr (talk) 15:42, 9 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I support speedy deletion of this article because she has not yet done something that would qualify her for an article. Thousands of people write scientific articles and thousands of people have considered running for Congress. Should Ms. Minning decide to run for Congress and her candidacy is significant enough that the media reports on it with some regularity, then there may be a strong argument that she deserves an article. Until then, this page should be deleted. --Vrivasfl (talk) 16:28, 9 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I will move the contents to my sandbox and then see if there are more media reports. Fayrfayr (talk) 16:35, 9 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Strange revert[edit]

This edit reverted the addition of material sourced to newspaper articles, the content of which can be easily verified by reading the articles. However, "inaccuraries" were claimed. Before deleting the material again, explain why these newspaper sources are supposedly "inaccurate". Hekerui (talk) 13:44, 6 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Dena Grayson. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20160305231301/http://agln.aspeninstitute.org/fellows/dena-minning to http://agln.aspeninstitute.org/fellows/dena-minning

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 22:05, 10 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]