Talk:Decisionism

	Germany portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Germany, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Germany on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.GermanyWikipedia:WikiProject GermanyTemplate:WikiProject GermanyGermany articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Philosophy: Ethics / Social and political Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Philosophy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of content related to philosophy on Wikipedia. If you would like to support the project, please visit the project page, where you can get more details on how you can help, and where you can join the general discussion about philosophy content on Wikipedia.PhilosophyWikipedia:WikiProject PhilosophyTemplate:WikiProject PhilosophyPhilosophy articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Associated task forces:
/
	Ethics
	Social and political philosophy

Law

	Law portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Law, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the legal field and the subjects encompassed by it.LawWikipedia:WikiProject LawTemplate:WikiProject Lawlaw articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Untitled[edit]

I made this partial translation of de:Dezisionismus. Please feel free to make it presentable. --Thorsen 12:49, 7 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The last part, on Habermas, seems absolutely unacceptable! Isn't it? Velho 23:51, 24 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I am not sure how one would be able to expound the meaning of Decisionism in a wikipedia article, but this cannot be that, since it is exactly the same as positivism, which Schmitt clearly was against. So, either there must be a difference which should be explained, or if a difference is lacking then Schmitt's position is incoherent and decisionism goes away as a meaningful category. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 160.39.140.47 (talk) 17:42, 30 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]