Talk:Dassault Ouragan

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Cleanup of Structure[edit]

This article is generally restructured to comply with Assessment Criteria 3 of Class B of Assessment Quality scale. Overall the article is in good shape. A Reassessment is requested to assign Class B.perseus71 (talk) 19:18, 3 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Citation Needed[edit]

According to the feedback received at the last assessment, this article has four bibliographic references, but footnotes only apply to two. I have added my won reference from Dassault Aviation. I don't have access to the Bibiliographic refereces myself. If someone else has access to them. Can you please provide appropriate citation ? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Perseus71 (talkcontribs) 16:35, 5 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

WP France B class assessment[edit]

This article is structured well, and written well. There are a number of citation needed tags which should be addressed prior to the article's promotion. Overall, good work. Lazulilasher (talk) 17:58, 17 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Dassault Ouragan. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 01:53, 30 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]