Talk:Danny!

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Former good article nomineeDanny! was a Music good articles nominee, but did not meet the good article criteria at the time. There may be suggestions below for improving the article. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
September 5, 2008Good article nomineeNot listed
April 7, 2013Good article nomineeNot listed
Current status: Former good article nominee

Fair use rationale for Image:Defjux.jpg[edit]

Image:Defjux.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot 03:08, 27 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Flfruit.png[edit]

Image:Flfruit.png is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 07:08, 1 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

GA Review[edit]

This review is transcluded from Talk:Danny!/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

I'm sorry, but I am going to have to quick-fail this. There are numerous POV problems and entire sections that are unreferenced.

  • 'Early Career (1999 - 2001)' is unreferenced.
  • 'College Life (2001 - 2003)' only one ref.
  • 'Post-Claflin (2003 - 2006)' no refs.
  • 'Breakthrough (2006 - 2007)' is unreferenced.
    • This section title is POV!
  • 'Present (2007 - )' has a decent number of references, but all of that material needs to be sourced.
  • No sales figuresfor his songs.
  • Did any of his songs get a 'chart position' ever?

Regrets, -talk- the_ed17 -contribs- 04:13, 5 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:Grammyslogo49.jpg[edit]

The image Image:Grammyslogo49.jpg is used in this article under a claim of fair use, but it does not have an adequate explanation for why it meets the requirements for such images when used here. In particular, for each page the image is used on, it must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Please check

  • That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's description page for the use in this article.
  • That this article is linked to from the image description page.

This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. --04:51, 13 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]


Why does this article read like a critique of his career? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.218.106.158 (talk) 07:35, 22 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

A Commons file used on this page has been nominated for deletion[edit]

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page has been nominated for deletion:

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 20:51, 27 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Socks and conflict of interest[edit]

A bunch of socks and IPs have edited this biography and related articles. Here's a list of involved editors. Binksternet (talk) 13:47, 15 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Danny!&oldid=1206876486"