A fact from Daniel Thrasher appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 9 February 2023 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourcedmust be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject YouTube, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of YouTube and related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.YouTubeWikipedia:WikiProject YouTubeTemplate:WikiProject YouTubeYouTube articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Internet culture, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of internet culture on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Internet cultureWikipedia:WikiProject Internet cultureTemplate:WikiProject Internet cultureInternet culture articles
The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by Bruxton (talk) 22:03, 29 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Moved to mainspace by Max263 (talk). Self-nominated at 13:24, 22 January 2023 (UTC).[reply]
Recently moved to the mainspace, is (just) long enough, doesn't have copyvio and nominator is exempt from QPQ. I have one big and one minor problem. The main issue is that I'm unsure if this is actually notable. The Tubefilter piece is not significant coverage, and I think the only source good enough to contribute to notability is the Forbes article. Got any additonal sources that can be used? The small problem is the hook: it's quite misleading *but* I think it can be run on April Fools Day it its current state. If you want it to run on a normal date it should be altered. ~StyyxTalk? 23:26, 24 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I agree that the hook in its current state is misleading – I've added an alternative above. If there is another way to phrase "accidentally re-created" then please add it as an ALT, as I would quite like it to run on a normal day. In terms of sources, the Forbes article would be best I think, as I agree that the Tubefilter article is not significant. The Los Angeles Times article does make the subject more notable I think, however it (annoyingly) does not mention the Office situation in the article. Max263 (talk • contribs) 17:53, 25 January 2023 (UTC) PS: Please let me know if I'm doing anything wrong – this is my first nomination so I am new to DYK![reply]
Max263, okey dokey lokey, ALT1 is good to be run on a normal date. The only problem is a paragraph in the "2021–2023: Rhett & Link investment and shows" section not having a source, unless leeky has something else to add. ~StyyxTalk? 21:52, 26 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Styyx, There are only primary sources available for that paragraph, which is unfortunate but it can be removed if necessary. Max263 (talk • contribs) 18:13, 27 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Max263, I don't see a DYK rule that phobits primary sources, though it is advised to not use them for "large passages". I ran the numbers and without that paragraph it's still above the minimum 1500 characters so it can be removed as well. I'm leaving it up to you here. ~StyyxTalk? 20:53, 28 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Styyx, I have added back the sources, which I believe follow the policy as they are minor and easily verifiable, and contribute to a notable paragraph. Is the hook ready for DYK now or is there more work that needs to be done? Max263 (talk • contribs) 21:03, 28 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
ALT1 is indeed ready to be run, as I said above.
Giving the green tick after all issues have been resolved. ~StyyxTalk? 21:05, 28 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Brilliant. Thank you very much for reviewing. Max263 (talk • contribs) 21:22, 28 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Recently moved to the mainspace, is (just) long enough, doesn't have copyvio and nominator is exempt from QPQ. I have one big and one minor problem. The main issue is that I'm unsure if this is actually notable. The Tubefilter piece is not significant coverage, and I think the only source good enough to contribute to notability is the Forbes article. Got any additonal sources that can be used? The small problem is the hook: it's quite misleading *but* I think it can be run on April Fools Day it its current state. If you want it to run on a normal date it should be altered. ~StyyxTalk? 23:26, 24 January 2023 (UTC)
Giving the green tick after all issues have been resolved. ~StyyxTalk? 21:05, 28 January 2023 (UTC)
