This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Australia: Riverina / Crime Mid‑importance

	Australia portal Daniel Morgan (bushranger) is within the scope of WikiProject Australia, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Australia and Australia-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page.AustraliaWikipedia:WikiProject AustraliaTemplate:WikiProject AustraliaAustralia articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Riverina (assessed as Low-importance).
	This article is supported by WikiProject Australian crime (assessed as Mid-importance).
	Need help improving this article? Ask a Librarian^{What's this?} at the National Library of Australia.
	The Wikimedia Australia chapter can be contacted via email to helpwikimedia.org.au for non-editorial assistance.

Biography

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article has been automatically rated by a bot or other tool because one or more other projects use this class. Please ensure the assessment is correct before removing the `\|auto=` parameter.

Taking from Morgan's dead body[edit]

Untitled[edit]

The movie says that Morgan's beard and scrotum were taken. Is this true? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 203.97.255.148 (talk) 09:31, 13 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Names[edit]

The article says his names were John Fuller and Dan Morgan. Why is he referred to as Owen (yes, that's his mother's name.) If he was called John Owen as a boy, when did he start to go by John Fuller?Parkwells (talk) 01:07, 13 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Dan Morgan (bushranger). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20150623173501/http://www.campbelltown.nsw.gov.au/MorganMadDan to http://www.campbelltown.nsw.gov.au/MorganMadDan

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 13:20, 15 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion[edit]

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:

CulcairnJohnMcLeansGrave.JPG

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 11:36, 14 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Article length[edit]

Daniel Morgan seems like a historically interesting character but this article is way too long and detailed, surely? 2604:2D80:D380:7600:E896:C6F0:A494:EA5F (talk) 08:55, 23 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The comment above is an extremely nebulous statement. This article is roughly half the length of the Ned Kelly article (as a comparison). This article (rated C-class) and the Kelly article (rated B-class) are both well-written and informative, complete with appropriate citations. Based on the respective ratings, the similarity of the subject matter and the level of detail, the length of this article seems about right. Ikeshut2 (talk) 19:04, 23 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]