Talk:Dana Barron

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

No Means No? No.[edit]

Several editors have attempted to add a television movie, No Means No, to the article today. There's no listing of it in Barron's filmography at IMDB, nor is there an entry for the title which shows her participating in any movie. I've removed the listing as bogus; any production for which a cast member (allegedly) won an Emmy would have more hits for it. —C.Fred (talk) 15:56, 6 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]


A person calling themself eastvilliage girl has been a real issue on the Dana Barron profile. They were playing the delete and undelete game for about 3 days. Thanks so much for your removal of bogus Dana Barron info. I believe this person should be blocked but I have no authority to say so or do so. Thanks again very much C.Fred. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Maxnethollywood (talkcontribs) 21:28, 7 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]


Sorry Fred, but Dana Barron was indeed in "No Means No" and it is listed at her IMDB profile. Its item number 31. It clearly lists "CBS Schoolbreak Special" .... Megan Wells (1 episode, 1988)

- No Means No (1988) TV episode .... Megan Wells". So how many people have done this too? They were all correct and you were incorrect. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 172.129.108.97 (talk) 21:00, 12 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Given that none of her other TV appearances are in the filmography, why does this special warrant inclusion? —C.Fred (talk) 21:32, 12 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Also, part of the deletion was for the claim that she won a Daytime Emmy for the special; there is no mention of her even being nominated on the CBS Schoolbreak Special awards page at IMDB.[1] Whoopi Goldberg and Lori Loughlin were the two actresses from the special who did receive nominations. —C.Fred (talk) 21:36, 12 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Well Fred, im not the person who posted the entries, but... she did indeed win a daytime emmy for this performance. Here is a link for you http://www.nndb.com/people/542/000122176/

As to why someone included "No Means No" in her filmography... i can only speculate the poster wanted it there for the reasons that she won an emmy for this performance and unlike many of her other roles where she was merely part of the cast, this was a starring role for her. She was the lead character. Seems you deleted stuff claiming none of it was true and you were continually in error for doing so. I would argue that her leading role and the winning of a daytime emmy for said role is what makes it more than appropriate to mention it on her wiki page. Theres more places to research than IMDB, Fred. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 172.129.108.97 (talk) 23:05, 12 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

And it does look like she is listed for her daytime emmy at IMDB http://www.imdb.com/name/nm0057654/awards —Preceding unsigned comment added by 172.129.108.97 (talk) 23:09, 12 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

You'll need a corroborating source other than IMDB. Because IMDB has changed since I looked at it above, it is likely that somebody has edited the IMDB listings. Sorry, based on that, no changes to the article here. —C.Fred (talk) 23:41, 12 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

There were 2 links to her winning a daytime emmy. http://www.nndb.com/people/542/000122176

No one has changed it. The link you had showing no mention of it still has no mention of it. Its the managers of IMDB that make changes.

Heres some more: http://danabarron.yolasite.com/ —Preceding unsigned comment added by 172.129.108.97 (talk) 00:07, 13 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Changes at IMDB are user-driven, though. And fansites, like yolasite, are not reliable. —C.Fred (talk) 01:45, 13 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]


It's difficult to get accurate references for Dana Barron as really she has always been a minor player in the world of Hollywood. Her most notable role was done when she was 17 years old playing a 14 year old and that was in 1983's Vacation. There are many references online to Dana's personal life including her much discussed 2 divorces from Dr. Tom Schmeck and Hollywood studio guitarist Jeff Fiorentino which were removed from this page by user EastViillageGirl and replaced with false info. I do believe Barron won a Daytime Emmy for No means No however the only true way to source that would be a reference from the accedemy of Television itself not IMDB. On that note I have to go with C.Fred. IMDB is not a credible source. It is unreferenced in many cases and edited by 3rd parties. Even IMDB itself says that it's not credible in its own about page and at the bottom of everyon'e bio. As for her personal info such as children, spouces, divorces etc all of that is only credibly referenced from public records which I don't believe can be linked here on Wikipedia. Which I learned the hard way. If I'm wrong then I stand corrected. But I must side with C.Fred in the case of No means No, or I should say, No means No when it comes to an unsourced IMDB listing on Wikipedia. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Maxnethollywood (talkcontribs) 17:46, 16 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Dana Barron. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 20:38, 5 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]