This article is within the scope of WikiProject Companies, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of companies on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CompaniesWikipedia:WikiProject CompaniesTemplate:WikiProject Companiescompany articles
This article has been automatically rated by a bot or other tool as Stub-class because it uses a stub template. Please ensure the assessment is correct before removing the |auto= parameter.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Business, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of business articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BusinessWikipedia:WikiProject BusinessTemplate:WikiProject BusinessWikiProject Business articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Energy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Energy on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EnergyWikipedia:WikiProject EnergyTemplate:WikiProject Energyenergy articles
To be included in Wikipedia, you must show that a company meets WP:CORP. All articles must meet WP:N and WP:V. Also, no original research is allowed per WP:OR. If you get to work providing information following the guidelines, your article will not have a problem. Mattisse(talk) 20:28, 10 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
This article was created in 2006 using the company "official website" in the "External links" section as sourcing . This goes against several policies and guidelines, that at best is company advertising or promotion just providing a Wikipedia business listing, as well as issues mentioned in the "Untitled" section above. Claims of original research cannot be argued against.
It is easy to ignore the "rules" and create articles, which should only take place when there are clear benefits to Wikipedia and still subjected to consensus, but 12 years later we are at the same place. If there is no sourcing or the article can not be merged to some sourced parent article then it should be deleted. Otr500 (talk) 18:26, 22 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Agree with these points.
Should be deleted. Who is the agent to do so? AmazonExplorer (talk) 07:08, 24 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
