Talk:Cost engineering

Engineering Low‑importance

	Engineering portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Engineering, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of engineering on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EngineeringWikipedia:WikiProject EngineeringTemplate:WikiProject EngineeringEngineering articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Technology

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Technology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.TechnologyWikipedia:WikiProject TechnologyTemplate:WikiProject TechnologyTechnology articles

Economics Low‑importance

	Business and economics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Economics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Economics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EconomicsWikipedia:WikiProject EconomicsTemplate:WikiProject EconomicsEconomics articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Comment[edit]

As a professional, certified cost engineer, I was surprised not to find a reference to my field here. However, now I know. When I add an article, it keeps getting recommended for deletion. I have no clue why. I thought the idea was that one person could get an article started, and others could help improve it. Apparently, it must be perfect from the get-go, entered by one of the initiated. Help.Jkhcanoe (talk) 04:33, 17 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Well, I might have been heavy hand by PRODing it. However, you do need to find third party references that meet WP:V and WP:RS. I'll remove the tags for now. Avec nat | Wikipédia Prends Des Forces. 04:38, 17 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Definition of Cost Engineer[edit]

Like you, I too am a certified cost engineer, but I think this should be combined with Quantity Surveyor. The reasoning behind my suggestion is "cost engineering" as a term has no rational basis. (See any standar English language dictionary for the terms "Cost" and "Engineering" and you can quickly see the term to be nonsensical in meaning- an oxymoron.

Furthermore, as RICS (Royal Institution of Chartered Surveyors) has agreed to reciprocity in recogning the CCC/E, supports my argument that the two defnitions should be merged.

BR, Dr. Paul Giammalvo, Jakarta, Indonesia Dr PDG (talk) 13:54, 21 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Cost Engineering is a valid and accepted profession[edit]

Cost engineering is an accepted and valid profession, even with dictionary definitions. For the area of application in which we are considering the defintion, which is construction and operation of facilites, cost is the monetary outlay required to achieve the objective, and an engineer is a person who is engaged in a profession which is a branch of engineering. Engineering is the application of science and mathematics to harness matter and energy to the benefit of mankind (and maybe animals now, too).

Although the term quantity surveyor predates the term cost engineer, it is an inadequate term to define the function of cost engineering. I would refer the reader to the dictionary to combine the terms quantity and surveyor. Quantity surveyors are a uniquely British (and related) profession, regulated by the respective governments. If there was an effort to expand that defined term and profession worldwide, it failed to do so.

While cost engineers and quantity surveyors (and for that matter cost estimators, preconstruction managers, and other named professions) may have differing titles and perform similar functions, the terms are already established and cannot be combined without some negotiation and agreement between the professions.

I would suggest for Wikipedia that we cross reference the professions and articles as much as possible. Gshills (talk) 20:21, 21 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Cost engineering. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20060929195003/http://www.aacei.org/ to http://www.aacei.org

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 08:32, 1 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]